Glamour described her vibe as the rich girl next door… and honestly that’s pretty accurate. Like it’s pretty much a given that she has some money given the track record of how well she’s in box office in general. But it’s the effortless girl next door vibe that she’s carried throughout her entire career that’s personally endearing
Her idgaf about the comments some lady made last week have me LIVING. Because regardless if this attendance was planned before the comments or not… Watching people who agree with that lady fuming over the fact that she looks so at peaceful and unbothered is hilarious
Lmao, the Daily Mail just came out with a story claiming she’s engaged to Kieran since she’s wearing a ring on her left hand. It’s the same ring she wore when she was with her friend in Venice last month and she wore that on her right hand. This is also the same outlet that’s claimed that she and Kieran broke up months ago. We haven’t seen much of him in months either. The Daily Fail is just speculating again.
I was just going to say it's the same ring she wore in Venice. It's not even a diamond ring. It's like when they thought she was engaged to Leo even though the ring looked like one you get in a box of cereal.
They don’t actually know anything about her private life which often leads them to contradicting themselves. Daily Fail was also the site that claimed she failed out of masters just to have photographic evidence of her participating as a coxswain less than a month later. Which made them back track and say she was getting her PhD instead (Oxford doesn’t have PhD’s for creative writing but they do them for literature… and they’re called DPhils) .
And it’s not from a lack of trying to get information about her either. They were asking about her around Concord and Canton when she filming LW. And I’ve heard that they’ve asked around Oxford for information about her ever since it was announced she was doing her masters.
They are hopeless but unfortunately other outlets will follow suit. It’s the ring she talks about buying for herself with stuff her friends gave her in the interview. I hope they don’t do something stupid like Deuxmoi and pretend she’s “married herself” and try make her look mental. She’s just got a nice ring!!
I’ve seen four different articles speculating that Emma’s engaged. Which is funny because she’s been wearing that ring for a while now… and even wore it on the Jay Shetty podcast. The same podcast they used clips of to drag her all last week. And it’s also the same podcast where she explains the story behind the ring… That Deuxmoi somehow still got wrong, even when the source material was feed to them on a silver platter.
The very ones who openly insulted Emma and under whose comments to the article Emma is called a thankless cow, upstanding and untalented actress? And these are censorship expressions. So no. Not a valid source for me.
I just think it’s very telling which sites will blindly follow Daily Fail’s stupidity. Because what do mean something is shown and explained to you (she explained the meaning of the ring on the podcast) and you somehow get the answer wrong? It also shows which sites had their journalists actually watch or listen to the podcast before writing their articles last week
One week: “the pressure to get married is violence against women” Two weeks later: “I’m engaged everyone!”
Hmmm I suspect Emma could probably work out how that would play in the press………..which bookie is taking bets on the Daily Fail making stuff up again? Or have they long since stopped taking those bets lol
She kind of did a similar thing with the whole “self-partnered” thing in 2019. She started dating Leo a couple months after. Of course, people started bashing her own that comment after it was revealed he was her boyfriend. I don’t know what the big deal was. You can still date while also being a confident, independent woman. I feel like that even if I’m dating someone.
Hi Eden; I'm Otelo, an admirer and fan of Emma, for over 10 years. I'm writing to find out how I can make payment and subscribe to the Emma fan club. I hope so.
Was already dating Leo at least two months before the self partnered comment though. Which she admitted was meant as a throw away comment that got taken way too seriously a few months later.
I had said for years that she is so private that we would never know she could be married for several years now and we wouldn’t know or if one day she just pops up at a bridal store, trying on gowns and then we’re like “oh she’s getting married??” But with her deep down inside, I truly think that when it’s a big life-changing thing like that, she would rather announce it herself, then have the media announcement for her. You know what I mean? Like I can see her being engaged for months and then finally posting on Instagram or something that she’s getting married. Not ever really saying who or whatever but she would probably break the news herself versus the media announcing it first.
The same site that had said in the early 2000s Jennifer Aniston was pregnant all the time according to like all their stories of them breaking that she was pregnant or expecting twins blah blah blah. She would’ve had six kids by now.
I think something that would be big in her life like engagement or even pregnancy. I think she herself would say it. Whether it be through Instagram or Twitter or some other means. I remember when some rumor went around like that years ago and she got on Twitter and told everybody to calm down and that if something like that ever happened, she would say it herself.
She had already been dating Leo for a couple of months before the self partnered comment though. And even admitted that people made into a bigger deal than she expected. Because to her it was just a throw away comment. Months later she decided to embrace it given how much it meant to others, regardless of the original intention.
At this point I don’t know if the Daily Fail are KB shippers or not… I mean they’re the ones that started the break up rumor and now starting the engagement rumors too… Wouldn’t it just be easier to just not write articles about stuff or people you don’t know… Especially when it can be debunked so easily that it makes you lose credibility?
Daily fail didnt listen to the podcast confirmed just made sh*t up from second hand info https://www.elle.com/culture/celebrities/a68888258/emma-watson-petal-ring-meaning/
That’s not quite right, the interview was done way before it was published, so would have been very early into her relationship with Leo. If it even was a relationship at that point, they may just have been dating and she openly said she was dating in that vogue interview
She mentioned her masters in the interview with Jay so whilst obviously up to her you’d have expected her to say about a PhD/DPhil if she was doing one.
This. She’s clearly still with Prada. And she she’s also gone to other designer shows during her time with them (though hasn’t here - she’s supporting Miuccia)
Regardless if she’s actually currently single or not… Her saying she wasn’t ready for marriage up until last year because she didn’t know herself that well yet. Is one of most genuinely honest things I’ve heard a woman in her mid 30’s say. So whether or not she’s still with KB… he was at least around to watch her figure herself out, when it comes to what she wants out of a relationship with marriage as the end goal. It also hints at the fact that they were or are more serious than we thought.
We have no way of knowing. It's entirely possible that the opposite is true that they weren't serious and DM splashing their pictures in multiple articles and declaring them serious is what made her rethink her approach.
her bf dont have to go everywhere with her but the fact he is 'nowhere' is kinda showing she single for 2025 at least always just with nupur or some other random people on all her outings
The way most British media sites went along with whatever the Daily Fail said, proves they either didn’t listen/watch the podcast or couldn’t be bothered to give a fuck. And honestly… I’m not surprised by either reason. Because one thing you can bet money on is; British media making shit up about a celebrity they don’t like or they twisting the quotes of a celebrity they don’t like to get them dragged. Either way the people in their comment sections will eat it up without questioning it.
I wasn’t going off of anything the Daily Fail said. I’m going off the fact my cousin did a year abroad last year at Hertford College, and said it wasn’t rare to see them together at the college he works. I don’t know or care if they’re still together as of now… but I know that the last time she saw them was this March. Meaning he was there (even if it was just as a friend) when she was figuring out what she wanted out of a romantic relationship.
I agree with their point that social pressure isn't violence but then they fall into the trap of "marriage is a stabilizing force". Almost half of marriages end in divorce, maybe divorce is the stabilizing force.
There’s a cute video of her fixing Derek’s hair. Which reminded of a clip in one of the behind the scenes for HP when she admits to fixing people’s hair subconsciously.
Anyone who says this isn’t “violence” has never lived in a family like that. We were raised to believe that if you don’t get married, you’re a failure. I remember how they looked at my unmarried aunts, as if they had no purpose. “What would she know? She stayed single. She doesn’t even have the right to keep the money she worked for, she should give it away since she’s single. She should do this or that because she has no obligations.” I’ve seen unmarried women be the only ones among their brothers to spend their own money caring for their parents when they were old, taking full responsibility and giving everything they earned to their brothers’ families and children, and in the end, when they needed help themselves, they were left alone. Now I’m at that age, my best friend is in hospitals, and when I talk to my mother about surgeries, her only response is to ask when I’ll get married. So yes, I completely agree with Emma, even if some think she’s exaggerating.
Good god, the DM are now doubling down and have done a whole piece on Kieran and contacted his family (who declined to comment) and have pics of him as a kid and teenager. Poor guy, they might even still be together and are definitely not engaged!!
Seems like somebody from Kieran’s got payed enough by the the Daily Fail to start talking … And they’re doubling down on the ring she’s worn since the Venice Film festival being tied to him…
Also whoever gave up his information AND his family members personal information is fucked up. Because I doubt she tried to keep it private (assuming that they’re still together) for this long, just for y’all to give up his immediate family’s information to the Daily Fail of all people.
Regarding Daily Fail’s insane knowledge about KB and his immediate family (pictures included). I guess it’s safe to say their latest article came from somebody he knows (family, friends or neighbors or even acquaintances). And if this plays out like it has in the past (ex-boyfriend’s inner circle talking to the press)…that breakup confirmation is going to be out before her birthday next year. However I’m unfortunately not surprised… because Daily Fail had people asking the locals (myself and my friends included) around Canton for information about her when she was filming LW.To be fair asked if we had information about any of the stars… but really insisted on getting information about Emma the most. It was lowkey uncomfortable how much they pressed for anything that could be used for a story.
Damn… Daily Fail really didn’t like being called out for being wrong about the ring … Because the way they just exposed all of KB’s alleged immediate family is insane… especially as they all led private lives prior to this article coming out. Also in case the person who gave the Daily Fail their private information is reading this…. and I mean this will nothing but disrespect when I say FUCK YOU for doing that.
Fail makes up sources all the time. Classic example: A "source" said she was settling down with Leo, after we already knew they'd broken up and she was with Brandon Green.
Am I the only one wondering how long Daily Fail has had Kieran and his family’s personal information? Like they just find out , or have they known for a while? Either way… it reads like a cop out for other sites debunking their assumption that the 22 petal ring was an engagement ring story. The whole article read as “look at what I allegedly know, that you don’t” towards other sites. Also, I don’t know how this works in England or South Africa… but where I’m from, but “news” sites can’t expose the family members of a private person (Kieran) unless the public person (Emma) they’re tied to, references them publicly first.
And please forgive my grammar as English isn’t my first language
I’m guessing somebody on here that actually knows KB got tired of y’all trying to downplay whatever is going on between them…
No but seriously, if I was KB I’d be questioning EVERYBODY right now. Because who the hell gives up peoples names and personal photos to the Daily Fail like that.
Said they were photographed in a bakery of July this year but lmao that was last year!!! they're updating an old article copy and pasted with info they found about his south African life xd
Tbh if he stays in a south africa compound now its explains why he is never seen anywhere....but then again there doesnt seem like a time this year when emma was in africa for several weeks because she was seen in europe or usa a few times a month all year...hmmm dunno
They say the trip happened last year after a July date but we conveniently have no evidence....also they write it like she was seen with him in july 2025 at the bakery date but it's from a year ago and last time he was actually seen
Unnamed sources also said she had a new love interest a few months ago and before that she was engaged to Leo LOL fail have clearly dug up this stuff through accounts online and adding family members as friends until someone actually accepted, its very common practice and all it takes is one extended family member or friend to let a jurno into the circle and bam they have 100s of photos and names and addresses just by lurking
They are trying to bait Emma to respond to them with harder and harder lies just like the Leo Situation where it got so bad she had to tweet about it. They want to antagonise her and maker her look bad online though an outburst.
it was allegedly a holiday he doesnt live there and we would have seen someone leak emma being in south africa as we do all countries she ends up in with candids
No but what truly fucked up, is if the people in the pictures aren’t even his actual family members. Or if they just picked completely random people with the same surname and decided that they were related. Because Daily Fail isn’t exactly one to double check literally anything. IF the people in the pictures are his relatives and those are their names… then I’m sorry on behalf of whoever sold them out to the Daily Fail. Because I know Eden said that she wouldn’t look at the article… but the pictures include what seems like personal pictures taken at family gatherings/holidays. And since they depict KB at different ages… it’s not that far of a reach to assume it depicts his relatives at different ages as well… Either way I knew the Daily Fail was worse than dog shit on a hot day… but the whole article somehow making them even worse. Because American press isn’t that much better, but at least they wouldn’t go that far over the line just because they got called out for being wrong. Even if they didn’t like the person… and in case you’re new here, the British press hasn’t exactly been fond of Emma since her He for She days.
Oh the Africa trip is very real we saw hassan was there too and nupur was posting about teh animals and jungle pics...seems very legit in hindsight...but this wa slast year not 2025 it could have ended between them since
Not really… I mean most the time nobody even knows where in the world she’s at. The candids we’ve gotten this year have been places that are common sense given her schedule and interests … Like being in Oxford towards the end of the scholastic year especially during testing periods or in major cities during film festivals and fashion shows. Other than Burning man(which we don’t even know for how long she was there for) she’s been good about leaving Europe without getting caught.
Not to be that person… but wasn’t there an anon that insisted that they saw Emma in South Africa with KB in March or May of this year? I just remember it was around the same time people jokingly (at least I hope y’all were joking) shipping her with any guy that wasn’t Felton or KB.
Ngl the Kieran article is something I’d expect out of The Sun not The Daily Fail… But that’s on me for expecting the Daily Fail to respect some boundaries… Like not posting the alleged names and pictures of people who are allegedly related to someone that is not even in the industry… just because they dated/are dating a actress… Don’t get me wrong, I know they’ve leaked the names of her exes relatives before (it was also fucked up back then) … But at least they didn’t post pictures of them at various ages, where they went to university or their former and current jobs/job title.
She never said she didn’t like marraige, I fact she said she hoped she might be worthy of it someday, she said she hated the portrayal of people especially women having failed due to not being married, so it’s the pressure and societal expectation that her issue is with. Not marriage
The article is like a follow-up to the ring story. The title is something like “the man who stole the Harry Potter actresses’ heart” Fail is still going along the lines that it’s an engagement ring. Fail similarly did the same thing with the private, family photos of Mack and Leo. I don’t know if someone got paid to submit those pictures or what, but Emma respects the privacy of her boyfriends and I don’t think either of them would accept this. Sorry KB fans, it’s definitely over. Fail is just running what all they have left using the ring story, even after it was proven to be a growth/friendship ring and not an engagement ring.
Daily Mail 100% did that on Mack, Leo and Matt. They ran stories about the death of Matt’s parents. They also ran numerous articles on Johnny making him look like a criminal.
The British written press is predominantly right wing so they haven’t liked her since she turned 18. The British is also known as the worst in the world for invasion of privacy and paparazzi stuff. Even the LA celebs regularly say that, that the British press is brutal
some here seem to think africa is one big country its not lol its Continent with many countries please retake geography if you think emma can be in south africa while needing to constantly go to france uk italy and america a few times a month all year
To be fair I knew Johnny as an actor before he and Emma dated. And his driving record wasn’t something that anyone who recognized his name wasn’t aware of. He was just lucky enough that people decided to look past it almost as if hadn’t happened. And I do remember reading about Matt’s parents and think how deeply fucked up it was to even post that type of thing in the first place. Especially because all he had done at the time, was date someone who went to university in the same general area as him. As for Mack I read on some forums that apparently she had given him the heads up about how invasive the British media could be, and he didn’t buy it at first… Idk if that’s true or if he believed her after they found out he was a twin and city he grew up in.
I agree that they definitely crossed the line when it comes to the private lives of exes. Especially the ones that quite literally had nothing to do with the entertainment industry. However I knew of Johnny from a couple of movies he’d been in before Perks. And his driving record wasn’t exactly a secret back then either.
You don’t have to post this Eden… but just as a heads up. There’s a blind item allegedly about having a PR boyfriend and getting anxious over losing followers on social media while not having any main roles.
But she hasn’t been caught with Kieran in a candid where you can see his face since last July. And it’s about to be a year in November since she posted anything besides a story on her main Instagram page and over a year and a half since she tweeted…
Oh my gosh, I can see why Emma puts off or has trouble with dating… The fact that that gossip site DM has all that information about KB’s family! 0..0 I’m sorry, but I could not date a celebrity if there’s gonna be gossip sites digging up all this information about me and my family like that. I mean it’s not Emma’s fault but that’s just horrible because they’re not together anymore and they’re still throwing him around with anything about her.
On the somewhat bright side ... in the U.S., no other sites are bothering to take the Daily Fail's KB article into consideration... They keep saying she's presumably single, with no mention of KB. Unfortunately, that also means Daily Fail will keep doubling down on their article until she either confirms a breakup or is spotted with somebody new (even if he's just a friend that the Daily Fail brands as her new boyfriend)... Either way, it's been a while since the Daily Fail has crossed the line this far when it comes to one of her boyfriends (their entire article on Matt's family made me feel ill).
Can I ask a question?… But does the Daily Fail do what they’ve done to KB, (as well as almost every single ex/current significant other of Emma’s) to all British celebrities? Or is Emma just a part of a select few they don’t give a fuck about when it comes to respecting her privacy?
Because I don’t recall them ever going as far as finding childhood pictures, as well as the general life story of anybody that the rest of the HP “children” cast dated. I might be wrong as I don’t follow that many British celebrities, but either way there’s one thing I think most people agree with… Is that the British press always takes it too far. Because I would understand if the guys she dated were in the industry as they would probably be aware that the Daily Fail would pull something like this someday… But I can’t imagine a stranger posting a condensed version of my life up until then, just because I was dating someone who never even mentioned my name publicly.
Can I just say… while the chances of Daily Fail digging around until they found all the information about KB to put into the article is a possibility. But the article also mentions a trip/her staying in South Africa during a time nobody knew where she was… And it’s not like any locals posted any candids of her… Which means somebody from Kieran’s side most likely got paid off for the tip… It doesn’t even have to be a family member either, just someone close enough to his immediate family that has access to the pictures and knows their names. Because I can’t find another reason for the Daily Fail to have childhood/teen aged pictures of him other than that.
There are millions of more effective ways for her to gain followers other than PR relationship, like respond to Jkr's tweet or sth. And I don't think a relationship with a private person could catch people(not include Daily Fail) eyeballs.
Don't think it is a PR campaign. Emma has said in the podcast that like-mindedness is a criteria. So maybe they both have similar outlook, thoughts values, etc.
daily mail dont know anything they just stole sh*t from meta which people publically still upload to for some reason despite the fact the data is all accessible and people have lost in court to zuck already for not reading the terms of service son his website that says facebook own that sh*t once you uploa dit there
Doubtful they stole anything tbh more lIke a journalist used a contact at meta to find certain accounts of interest and lifted anything public from there. If even one family member or friend has an open account or doesnt realise pictures and post have been left on 'public' across threads/insta/facebook etc it would be easy to gather lots of information
Meta sites actually train AI on everyones posts now by default and unless you turned off that setting in a hidden menu to opt out of it your data is being harvested all the time and pictures easily stolen
To the anon asking if it's just with Emma, not really, they do that to anyone that is famous enough to get them the clics. Example: Jessica Chastain, there was a time when she was getting more and more famous and she was nominated to a Oscar and had started dating this italian count(today he's her husband) and somehow the Daily Mail got hold of several pictures of the time she was a baby and newborn and then made a article about her biological father and how Jessica didn't have any contact with him or his children and how his mother (her granny) loved her and missed her. The whole article was written in a ton that it made look like he was a poor thing and she was ungrateful and basically doubting what she said about growing up in a difficult situation. Jessica didn't responded for a while, however later it was revealed (by a real journalist this time)that the biological dad was a shitty man that had several children with different woman and that he was so abusive with Jessica's mother that she had to runaway in the middle of the night with baby Jessica and that's why Jessica doesn't talk to him or know him at all. And I remember that article filled with photos from him and his children. Later when he died Jessica revealed that she didn't know him, never even talked to the guy and that her real father was her stepdad and that the biological father and his children only went after her after they started to see her on movies and he knew it was her because Jessica uses her mother's name Chastain wich is a uncommon name. And Jessica years later said it was so hurtful that that a publication like that(dailymail) was lying and making look like he was a good man and meddling with her family's story like that just because she was starting to get attention at the time. She just didn't sue because it would give more attention to it and she didn't want to hurt her mother. But the part in which she said all the involved were non famous people stuck, she was only starting to get recognition for her work and the daily mail minding where it wasn't their business. They're also did several articles abou her now husband at the time they started dating.
So yes if you're famous and your name it's hot then the daily mail will make article's that look like they know something but doesn't. Another example: several articles about Jenna Ortega and the non famous people around her
Don’t get me wrong, the Kieran article is bad. But I can’t imagine just how much worse it is for him if they’re already broken up… Because assuming that they were able to find private/personal pictures (instead of somebody giving them a tip off) like this, then it’s safe to say they already found his or his families social media accounts that are public… Which reminds me of how quickly people found Leo’s accounts when they were still together, and Mack’s after they broke up
They finally did an article acknowledge the real meaning of the ring and how emma explained it on the podcast....clowns they knew the whole time just wanted clicks
"That’s at least about Jessica and not an expose on her partners family, which is different. The equivalent would be if it was the counts father"
well as I said, they did several articles about not only the count and his whole family and friends (they even listed his ex-girlfriends) but also about everybody that was around her and none was famous. And that's a thing the DM does since forever, several actors/singers already talked about how invasive they are with people that are not in business but are close to them. Also DM doesn't give a shit about laws. Another example would be Evan Rachel Wood when she was leaving a appointment and had the ultrasound of her baby in hand and they zoomed and put it in the main page of their site like "Exclusive! Evan's baby pic". Evan was pissed and demanded they took it down but they didn't and then she sued them because it was literally against the law to reveal private medical records of people and only THEN they took out. There's also the famous case of the footballer Rooney's son, that was attending a game and Romney's team lost and they put in front page with a phrases implying the kid was upset with his father and everyone got pissed because not only they were using a kid for a feud they had with Ronney but also because it was illegal to put/use a kids face without blurring and without their parents consent since the child was not famous. My point it's that it doesn't matter if it's unethical, a lie, or illegal, they will do it just for clicks.
HAHAHAHAHA that anon talking about "well at least it was just Jessica and not her boyfriends family" must be really joking because that man whole life was out there in several different articles. I remember because at the time I was into Jessica's work and every time I tried to search for news of new films the hundreds of articles about him on DM popped up. No one it's obligated to know about DM practices but it's their thing to make articles about people that are not famous but are seen close to famous people, doesn't even have to be a romantic partner, they will lie and say whatever just to get a history that generate revenue, that's why they always have this "unnamed sources" bullshit. Several people sued them for this but they're are owned by big fish, unless there's laws regulations nothings gonna happen.
160 comments:
Kitten ❤️
There’s a cute video of her and Nina Dobrev greeting each other by the stairs
It's already posted
Cute outfit but I don’t like the shoes 🙈
She looks great in autumn colours!
Ring on her left hand wth wth wth wth
Added 8 videos including Emma leaving on a motorcycle.
Glad to see she isn't laying low after the podcast. Not that she has anything to lay low about.
Emma seems much happier and more at-ease doing photocalls and red carpets now, more amused by the pressure than anything.
That little thumbs-up before she pulls her friend across is adorable.
I think between this and SNL it’s a great start to the week for Emma…
Thank you so much for sharing all this beautiful pictures and videos :)
Ring on her left hand doesn't say anything. I wear a ring on my left hand and i'm not engaged or married 🙈
Emma wears a ring there all the time.
I believe she mentioned it in her interview that is for her friends
I love her smile there.
She looked like she had fun!
Wearing Tom’s favorite color two days in a row 😍
Glamour described her vibe as the rich girl next door… and honestly that’s pretty accurate. Like it’s pretty much a given that she has some money given the track record of how well she’s in box office in general. But it’s the effortless girl next door vibe that she’s carried throughout her entire career that’s personally endearing
Her idgaf about the comments some lady made last week have me LIVING. Because regardless if this attendance was planned before the comments or not… Watching people who agree with that lady fuming over the fact that she looks so at peaceful and unbothered is hilarious
why did she leave on a bike???
This hair color looks amazing on her. I hope she doesn't change it; she was a brunette for a long time.
SNL was so funny
Lmao, the Daily Mail just came out with a story claiming she’s engaged to Kieran since she’s wearing a ring on her left hand. It’s the same ring she wore when she was with her friend in Venice last month and she wore that on her right hand. This is also the same outlet that’s claimed that she and Kieran broke up months ago. We haven’t seen much of him in months either. The Daily Fail is just speculating again.
I was just going to say it's the same ring she wore in Venice. It's not even a diamond ring. It's like when they thought she was engaged to Leo even though the ring looked like one you get in a box of cereal.
They don’t actually know anything about her private life which often leads them to contradicting themselves. Daily Fail was also the site that claimed she failed out of masters just to have photographic evidence of her participating as a coxswain less than a month later. Which made them back track and say she was getting her PhD instead (Oxford doesn’t have PhD’s for creative writing but they do them for literature… and they’re called DPhils) .
And it’s not from a lack of trying to get information about her either. They were asking about her around Concord and Canton when she filming LW. And I’ve heard that they’ve asked around Oxford for information about her ever since it was announced she was doing her masters.
She is dating this bike guy?
said she married leo and also is marrying mack knight how many times she been married now according to DM very legit source clearly?
They are hopeless but unfortunately other outlets will follow suit. It’s the ring she talks about buying for herself with stuff her friends gave her in the interview. I hope they don’t do something stupid like Deuxmoi and pretend she’s “married herself” and try make her look mental. She’s just got a nice ring!!
The alleged mansion in Jericho that she bought is also closer to the college where KB allegedly works. So yeah ! Very well maybe.
I think they maybe planning about it, at the most.
I’ve seen four different articles speculating that Emma’s engaged. Which is funny because she’s been wearing that ring for a while now… and even wore it on the Jay Shetty podcast. The same podcast they used clips of to drag her all last week. And it’s also the same podcast where she explains the story behind the ring… That Deuxmoi somehow still got wrong, even when the source material was feed to them on a silver platter.
I know the story behind the ring that’s being used to speculate whether or not she’s engaged… anybody who actually listened to the podcast knows…
But honestly it would be funny if Emma actually does get engaged someday and we assume it’s just another friendship ring
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/nfl/article-15168851/taylor-swift-travis-kelce-manhood-wood-life-showgirl-song.html
lol 😂 the” magic wand “
so good to see her after the podcast.
Interesting sunglasses
And now because DF said it all the other tabloids are blindly running it.
The very ones who openly insulted Emma and under whose comments to the article Emma is called a thankless cow, upstanding and untalented actress? And these are censorship expressions. So no. Not a valid source for me.
I just think it’s very telling which sites will blindly follow Daily Fail’s stupidity. Because what do mean something is shown and explained to you (she explained the meaning of the ring on the podcast) and you somehow get the answer wrong? It also shows which sites had their journalists actually watch or listen to the podcast before writing their articles last week
One week: “the pressure to get married is violence against women”
Two weeks later: “I’m engaged everyone!”
Hmmm I suspect Emma could probably work out how that would play in the press………..which bookie is taking bets on the Daily Fail making stuff up again? Or have they long since stopped taking those bets lol
There's a small unseen clip of Emma in Miu Miu's reel of guests.
Fact DM said they getting married means its sooooo over tbh lol
She kind of did a similar thing with the whole “self-partnered” thing in 2019. She started dating Leo a couple months after. Of course, people started bashing her own that comment after it was revealed he was her boyfriend. I don’t know what the big deal was. You can still date while also being a confident, independent woman. I feel like that even if I’m dating someone.
Hi Eden; I'm Otelo, an admirer and fan of Emma, for over 10 years.
I'm writing to find out how I can make payment and subscribe to the Emma fan club.
I hope so.
Was already dating Leo at least two months before the self partnered comment though. Which she admitted was meant as a throw away comment that got taken way too seriously a few months later.
How do you know this?
Married?
I had said for years that she is so private that we would never know she could be married for several years now and we wouldn’t know or if one day she just pops up at a bridal store, trying on gowns and then we’re like “oh she’s getting married??”
But with her deep down inside, I truly think that when it’s a big life-changing thing like that, she would rather announce it herself, then have the media announcement for her. You know what I mean?
Like I can see her being engaged for months and then finally posting on Instagram or something that she’s getting married.
Not ever really saying who or whatever but she would probably break the news herself versus the media announcing it first.
The same site that had said in the early 2000s Jennifer Aniston was pregnant all the time according to like all their stories of them breaking that she was pregnant or expecting twins blah blah blah. She would’ve had six kids by now.
I think something that would be big in her life like engagement or even pregnancy. I think she herself would say it.
Whether it be through Instagram or Twitter or some other means.
I remember when some rumor went around like that years ago and she got on Twitter and told everybody to calm down and that if something like that ever happened, she would say it herself.
I don't think Emma is pursuing a PHD, her schedule in September and early October seems to be too full for academic.
People know that Miu Miu is fully owned by Prada right? It’s literally named after the childhood nickname of creative director Miuccia Prada
She had already been dating Leo for a couple of months before the self partnered comment though. And even admitted that people made into a bigger deal than she expected. Because to her it was just a throw away comment. Months later she decided to embrace it given how much it meant to others, regardless of the original intention.
At this point I don’t know if the Daily Fail are KB shippers or not… I mean they’re the ones that started the break up rumor and now starting the engagement rumors too… Wouldn’t it just be easier to just not write articles about stuff or people you don’t know… Especially when it can be debunked so easily that it makes you lose credibility?
Daily fail didnt listen to the podcast confirmed just made sh*t up from second hand info https://www.elle.com/culture/celebrities/a68888258/emma-watson-petal-ring-meaning/
There's no fan club.
Fail has never had credibility. They wrote clickbait and they don’t even look at their own past articles. You seem surprised?
That’s not quite right, the interview was done way before it was published, so would have been very early into her relationship with Leo. If it even was a relationship at that point, they may just have been dating and she openly said she was dating in that vogue interview
She mentioned her masters in the interview with Jay so whilst obviously up to her you’d have expected her to say about a PhD/DPhil if she was doing one.
This. She’s clearly still with Prada. And she she’s also gone to other designer shows during her time with them (though hasn’t here - she’s supporting Miuccia)
Regardless if she’s actually currently single or not… Her saying she wasn’t ready for marriage up until last year because she didn’t know herself that well yet. Is one of most genuinely honest things I’ve heard a woman in her mid 30’s say. So whether or not she’s still with KB… he was at least around to watch her figure herself out, when it comes to what she wants out of a relationship with marriage as the end goal. It also hints at the fact that they were or are more serious than we thought.
Elle US called them out, so now a bunch of other tabloids are running "No she's not really engaged" stories too.
We have no way of knowing. It's entirely possible that the opposite is true that they weren't serious and DM splashing their pictures in multiple articles and declaring them serious is what made her rethink her approach.
US weekly were the first I think. But yes lots doing that now
her bf dont have to go everywhere with her but the fact he is 'nowhere' is kinda showing she single for 2025 at least always just with nupur or some other random people on all her outings
Is there any connection to Emma? Or just in general?
It's not even a diamond ring, is it? Looks like a pearl ring.
The way most British media sites went along with whatever the Daily Fail said, proves they either didn’t listen/watch the podcast or couldn’t be bothered to give a fuck. And honestly… I’m not surprised by either reason. Because one thing you can bet money on is; British media making shit up about a celebrity they don’t like or they twisting the quotes of a celebrity they don’t like to get them dragged. Either way the people in their comment sections will eat it up without questioning it.
I wasn’t going off of anything the Daily Fail said. I’m going off the fact my cousin did a year abroad last year at Hertford College, and said it wasn’t rare to see them together at the college he works. I don’t know or care if they’re still together as of now… but I know that the last time she saw them was this March. Meaning he was there (even if it was just as a friend) when she was figuring out what she wanted out of a romantic relationship.
lol. Oxford Mail running a headline that Emma "breaks her silence on diamond ring" even though she talked about it before their bullshit rumors.
https://www.independentwomen.com/2025/10/09/no-emma-watson-encouraging-marriage-isnt-violence/
I agree with their point that social pressure isn't violence but then they fall into the trap of "marriage is a stabilizing force". Almost half of marriages end in divorce, maybe divorce is the stabilizing force.
Emma clearly doesnt like the institution of marriage media need to stop forcing her into one every few years when they need clicks
There’s a cute video of her fixing Derek’s hair. Which reminded of a clip in one of the behind the scenes for HP when she admits to fixing people’s hair subconsciously.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15176413/amp/South-African-Rhodes-scholar-Harry-Potter-Emma-Watson-diamond-ring.html
Intersting. Here some people were claiming his entire family is phds.
Anyone who says this isn’t “violence” has never lived in a family like that. We were raised to believe that if you don’t get married, you’re a failure. I remember how they looked at my unmarried aunts, as if they had no purpose. “What would she know? She stayed single. She doesn’t even have the right to keep the money she worked for, she should give it away since she’s single. She should do this or that because she has no obligations.” I’ve seen unmarried women be the only ones among their brothers to spend their own money caring for their parents when they were old, taking full responsibility and giving everything they earned to their brothers’ families and children, and in the end, when they needed help themselves, they were left alone. Now I’m at that age, my best friend is in hospitals, and when I talk to my mother about surgeries, her only response is to ask when I’ll get married. So yes, I completely agree with Emma, even if some think she’s exaggerating.
I love it when Daily Fail get called out so they have to double down with "sources".
Good god, the DM are now doubling down and have done a whole piece on Kieran and contacted his family (who declined to comment) and have pics of him as a kid and teenager. Poor guy, they might even still be together and are definitely not engaged!!
Seems like somebody from Kieran’s got payed enough by the the Daily Fail to start talking … And they’re doubling down on the ring she’s worn since the Venice Film festival being tied to him…
Also whoever gave up his information AND his family members personal information is fucked up. Because I doubt she tried to keep it private (assuming that they’re still together) for this long, just for y’all to give up his immediate family’s information to the Daily Fail of all people.
Regarding Daily Fail’s insane knowledge about KB and his immediate family (pictures included). I guess it’s safe to say their latest article came from somebody he knows (family, friends or neighbors or even acquaintances). And if this plays out like it has in the past (ex-boyfriend’s inner circle talking to the press)…that breakup confirmation is going to be out before her birthday next year. However I’m unfortunately not surprised… because Daily Fail had people asking the locals (myself and my friends included) around Canton for information about her when she was filming LW.To be fair asked if we had information about any of the stars… but really insisted on getting information about Emma the most. It was lowkey uncomfortable how much they pressed for anything that could be used for a story.
Damn… Daily Fail really didn’t like being called out for being wrong about the ring … Because the way they just exposed all of KB’s alleged immediate family is insane… especially as they all led private lives prior to this article coming out. Also in case the person who gave the Daily Fail their private information is reading this…. and I mean this will nothing but disrespect when I say FUCK YOU for doing that.
Fail makes up sources all the time. Classic example: A "source" said she was settling down with Leo, after we already knew they'd broken up and she was with Brandon Green.
Am I the only one wondering how long Daily Fail has had Kieran and his family’s personal information? Like they just find out , or have they known for a while? Either way… it reads like a cop out for other sites debunking their assumption that the 22 petal ring was an engagement ring story. The whole article read as “look at what I allegedly know, that you don’t” towards other sites. Also, I don’t know how this works in England or South Africa… but where I’m from, but “news” sites can’t expose the family members of a private person (Kieran) unless the public person (Emma) they’re tied to, references them publicly first.
And please forgive my grammar as English isn’t my first language
No one is telling them anything they are lying as usual with their 'sources'
They said people told them she was on a date with park painting man too. When daily fail says it you know it's clearly over lol
I’m guessing somebody on here that actually knows KB got tired of y’all trying to downplay whatever is going on between them…
No but seriously, if I was KB I’d be questioning EVERYBODY right now. Because who the hell gives up peoples names and personal photos to the Daily Fail like that.
Said they were photographed in a bakery of July this year but lmao that was last year!!! they're updating an old article copy and pasted with info they found about his south African life xd
Tbh if he stays in a south africa compound now its explains why he is never seen anywhere....but then again there doesnt seem like a time this year when emma was in africa for several weeks because she was seen in europe or usa a few times a month all year...hmmm dunno
The ring is one of those petal rings she brings up in the podcast lmao no one at fail clearly listened to the podcast they are reporting on hahaha
Higher than half of actor marriage and celeb marriage with at least one famous partner fail actually
https://people.com/emma-watson-reveals-meaning-behind-sparkly-ring-shes-been-wearing-on-that-finger-11825603 fail being owned by other outlets lol
They say the trip happened last year after a July date but we conveniently have no evidence....also they write it like she was seen with him in july 2025 at the bakery date but it's from a year ago and last time he was actually seen
Unnamed sources also said she had a new love interest a few months ago and before that she was engaged to Leo LOL fail have clearly dug up this stuff through accounts online and adding family members as friends until someone actually accepted, its very common practice and all it takes is one extended family member or friend to let a jurno into the circle and bam they have 100s of photos and names and addresses just by lurking
They are trying to bait Emma to respond to them with harder and harder lies just like the Leo Situation where it got so bad she had to tweet about it. They want to antagonise her and maker her look bad online though an outburst.
it was allegedly a holiday he doesnt live there and we would have seen someone leak emma being in south africa as we do all countries she ends up in with candids
its easy to find on facebook when you look....
No that actually had a named person and not just 'a source'
Eden what do you think is happening is fail lying or actually paid someone to tell all this?
People here said his entire family is phds.
I didn't look at the article and don't plan to so I don't know. But if there are photos, I guess they paid someone.
The source was just a passer-by, not someone who knows them.
No but what truly fucked up, is if the people in the pictures aren’t even his actual family members. Or if they just picked completely random people with the same surname and decided that they were related. Because Daily Fail isn’t exactly one to double check literally anything. IF the people in the pictures are his relatives and those are their names… then I’m sorry on behalf of whoever sold them out to the Daily Fail. Because I know Eden said that she wouldn’t look at the article… but the pictures include what seems like personal pictures taken at family gatherings/holidays. And since they depict KB at different ages… it’s not that far of a reach to assume it depicts his relatives at different ages as well… Either way I knew the Daily Fail was worse than dog shit on a hot day… but the whole article somehow making them even worse. Because American press isn’t that much better, but at least they wouldn’t go that far over the line just because they got called out for being wrong. Even if they didn’t like the person… and in case you’re new here, the British press hasn’t exactly been fond of Emma since her He for She days.
I wouldn't surprised if their "source" was someone here, the way people dig through social media accounts of people who are spotted with her.
Oh the Africa trip is very real we saw hassan was there too and nupur was posting about teh animals and jungle pics...seems very legit in hindsight...but this wa slast year not 2025 it could have ended between them since
She did it once to Daniel Radcliffe in POA.
That's so creepy
Not really… I mean most the time nobody even knows where in the world she’s at. The candids we’ve gotten this year have been places that are common sense given her schedule and interests … Like being in Oxford towards the end of the scholastic year especially during testing periods or in major cities during film festivals and fashion shows. Other than Burning man(which we don’t even know for how long she was there for) she’s been good about leaving Europe without getting caught.
I was thinking the same thing, it is also illegal in my country.
Not to be that person… but wasn’t there an anon that insisted that they saw Emma in South Africa with KB
in March or May of this year? I just remember it was around the same time people jokingly (at least I hope y’all were joking) shipping her with any guy that wasn’t Felton or KB.
Ngl the Kieran article is something I’d expect out of The Sun not The Daily Fail… But that’s on me for expecting the Daily Fail to respect some boundaries… Like not posting the alleged names and pictures of people who are allegedly related to someone that is not even in the industry… just because they dated/are dating a actress… Don’t get me wrong, I know they’ve leaked the names of her exes relatives before (it was also fucked up back then) … But at least they didn’t post pictures of them at various ages, where they went to university or their former and current jobs/job title.
I agree with an anon above that they likely dug through online accounts until they found something
She never said she didn’t like marraige, I fact she said she hoped she might be worthy of it someday, she said she hated the portrayal of people especially women having failed due to not being married, so it’s the pressure and societal expectation that her issue is with. Not marriage
The article is like a follow-up to the ring story. The title is something like “the man who stole the Harry Potter actresses’ heart” Fail is still going along the lines that it’s an engagement ring. Fail similarly did the same thing with the private, family photos of Mack and Leo. I don’t know if someone got paid to submit those pictures or what, but Emma respects the privacy of her boyfriends and I don’t think either of them would accept this. Sorry KB fans, it’s definitely over. Fail is just running what all they have left using the ring story, even after it was proven to be a growth/friendship ring and not an engagement ring.
Emma doesn't seem to have anything against marriage. She actually seems to hold marriage on a pedestal, having literally called it a "miracle."
Parents divorcing when she was a child plus being unable to tell if men wanted her or Hermione really did a number on her romantic confidence.
That was Rwanda, not South Africa.
Sorry, forgot to mention that it was for her birthday during the Easter break.
Daily Mail 100% did that on Mack, Leo and Matt. They ran stories about the death of Matt’s parents. They also ran numerous articles on Johnny making him look like a criminal.
Perfectly legal in UK unfortunately
The British written press is predominantly right wing so they haven’t liked her since she turned 18.
The British is also known as the worst in the world for invasion of privacy and paparazzi stuff. Even the LA celebs regularly say that, that the British press is brutal
They got the stuff from Mack off open social media accounts of family members. I reckon this is the same.
That was a completely different country !!!
Could have easily headed to south africa at same time
They're over 2000 miles apart. That's like going to London on holiday and thinking "Let's pop over to Moscow after this".
some here seem to think africa is one big country its not lol its Continent with many countries please retake geography if you think emma can be in south africa while needing to constantly go to france uk italy and america a few times a month all year
To be fair I knew Johnny as an actor before he and Emma dated. And his driving record wasn’t something that anyone who recognized his name wasn’t aware of. He was just lucky enough that people decided to look past it almost as if hadn’t happened. And I do remember reading about Matt’s parents and think how deeply fucked up it was to even post that type of thing in the first place. Especially because all he had done at the time, was date someone who went to university in the same general area as him. As for Mack I read on some forums that apparently she had given him the heads up about how invasive the British media could be, and he didn’t buy it at first… Idk if that’s true or if he believed her after they found out he was a twin and city he grew up in.
The source never said it looked like it was a date though, Daily Fail did.
I agree that they definitely crossed the line when it comes to the private lives of exes. Especially the ones that quite literally had nothing to do with the entertainment industry. However I knew of Johnny from a couple of movies he’d been in before Perks. And his driving record wasn’t exactly a secret back then either.
You don’t have to post this Eden… but just as a heads up. There’s a blind item allegedly about having a PR boyfriend and getting anxious over losing followers on social media while not having any main roles.
But she hasn’t been caught with Kieran in a candid where you can see his face since last July. And it’s about to be a year in November since she posted anything besides a story on her main Instagram page and over a year and a half since she tweeted…
Oh my gosh, I can see why Emma puts off or has trouble with dating…
The fact that that gossip site DM has all that information about KB’s family! 0..0
I’m sorry, but I could not date a celebrity if there’s gonna be gossip sites digging up all this information about me and my family like that.
I mean it’s not Emma’s fault but that’s just horrible because they’re not together anymore and they’re still throwing him around with anything about her.
On the somewhat bright side ... in the U.S., no other sites are bothering to take the Daily Fail's KB article into consideration... They keep saying she's presumably single, with no mention of KB. Unfortunately, that also means Daily Fail will keep doubling down on their article until she either confirms a breakup or is spotted with somebody new (even if he's just a friend that the Daily Fail brands as her new boyfriend)... Either way, it's been a while since the Daily Fail has crossed the line this far when it comes to one of her boyfriends (their entire article on Matt's family made me feel ill).
There’s no way he was/is a PR boyfriend lol. The media is even making up an engagement
Nonsense, it’d be close to mose colleges in Oxford. That’s what happens if you buy something in Oxford
As above it was the opinion of a passerby in the park, not somebody who knows anything
Can I ask a question?…
But does the Daily Fail do what they’ve done to KB, (as well as almost every single ex/current significant other of Emma’s) to all British celebrities? Or is Emma just a part of a select few they don’t give a fuck about when it comes to respecting her privacy?
Because I don’t recall them ever going as far as finding childhood pictures, as well as the general life story of anybody that the rest of the HP “children” cast dated. I might be wrong as I don’t follow that many British celebrities, but either way there’s one thing I think most people agree with… Is that the British press always takes it too far. Because I would understand if the guys she dated were in the industry as they would probably be aware that the Daily Fail would pull something like this someday… But I can’t imagine a stranger posting a condensed version of my life up until then, just because I was dating someone who never even mentioned my name publicly.
Can I just say… while the chances of Daily Fail digging around until they found all the information about KB to put into the article is a possibility. But the article also mentions a trip/her staying in South Africa during a time nobody knew where she was… And it’s not like any locals posted any candids of her… Which means somebody from Kieran’s side most likely got paid off for the tip… It doesn’t even have to be a family member either, just someone close enough to his immediate family that has access to the pictures and knows their names. Because I can’t find another reason for the Daily Fail to have childhood/teen aged pictures of him other than that.
Sup Eden , i heard someone talking about pottershots on here. Thought that closed down? 🤔
There are millions of more effective ways for her to gain followers other than PR relationship, like respond to Jkr's tweet or sth. And I don't think a relationship with a private person could catch people(not include Daily Fail) eyeballs.
Don't think it is a PR campaign. Emma has said in the podcast that like-mindedness is a criteria. So maybe they both have similar outlook, thoughts values, etc.
You mean the same site insists Taylor Swift is a lesbian?
It did.
The blinds about her after the podcast all have the same undertone to them… Almost like they’re coming from somebody’s camp… just saying🤷🏻♀️.
They had childhood photos of both Mack and Matt.
Emma is part of a select few of very famous people that see they do that to yes
Didn't you recreate it though?
I created a Pottershots blog but no one was posting so I deleted it.
daily mail dont know anything they just stole sh*t from meta which people publically still upload to for some reason despite the fact the data is all accessible
and people have lost in court to zuck already for not reading the terms of service son his website that says facebook own that sh*t once you uploa dit there
Yeah there was an actual named person involved less shady than 'sources say'
Can't you open it again as you said it was for members of the old pottershots?
Eden when will we see Emma again you think?
Doubtful they stole anything tbh more lIke a journalist used a contact at meta to find certain accounts of interest and lifted anything public from there. If even one family member or friend has an open account or doesnt realise pictures and post have been left on 'public' across threads/insta/facebook etc it would be easy to gather lots of information
Meta sites actually train AI on everyones posts now by default and unless you turned off that setting in a hidden menu to opt out of it your data is being harvested all the time and pictures easily stolen
It'll be a surprise.
I can recreate it but I doubt anyone will use it again.
Oh that would be AWESOME... I was part of your old pottershots 2.0 i loved it 🙂
To the anon asking if it's just with Emma, not really, they do that to anyone that is famous enough to get them the clics.
Example: Jessica Chastain, there was a time when she was getting more and more famous and she was nominated to a Oscar and had started dating this italian count(today he's her husband) and somehow the Daily Mail got hold of several pictures of the time she was a baby and newborn and then made a article about her biological father and how Jessica didn't have any contact with him or his children and how his mother (her granny) loved her and missed her. The whole article was written in a ton that it made look like he was a poor thing and she was ungrateful and basically doubting what she said about growing up in a difficult situation.
Jessica didn't responded for a while, however later it was revealed (by a real journalist this time)that the biological dad was a shitty man that had several children with different woman and that he was so abusive with Jessica's mother that she had to runaway in the middle of the night with baby Jessica and that's why Jessica doesn't talk to him or know him at all. And I remember that article filled with photos from him and his children. Later when he died Jessica revealed that she didn't know him, never even talked to the guy and that her real father was her stepdad and that the biological father and his children only went after her after they started to see her on movies and he knew it was her because Jessica uses her mother's name Chastain wich is a uncommon name. And Jessica years later said it was so hurtful that that a publication like that(dailymail) was lying and making look like he was a good man and meddling with her family's story like that just because she was starting to get attention at the time. She just didn't sue because it would give more attention to it and she didn't want to hurt her mother. But the part in which she said all the involved were non famous people stuck, she was only starting to get recognition for her work and the daily mail minding where it wasn't their business. They're also did several articles abou her now husband at the time they started dating.
So yes if you're famous and your name it's hot then the daily mail will make article's that look like they know something but doesn't.
Another example: several articles about Jenna Ortega and the non famous people around her
Not long to go eden we are so happy
That’s at least about Jessica and not an expose on her partners family, which is different. The equivalent would be if it was the counts father
Don’t get me wrong, the Kieran article is bad. But I can’t imagine just how much worse it is for him if they’re already broken up… Because assuming that they were able to find private/personal pictures (instead of somebody giving them a tip off) like this, then it’s safe to say they already found his or his families social media accounts that are public… Which reminds me of how quickly people found Leo’s accounts when they were still together, and Mack’s after they broke up
They finally did an article acknowledge the real meaning of the ring and how emma explained it on the podcast....clowns they knew the whole time just wanted clicks
When will we see Emma again If she've finished her master.
About what? What's the context here?
"That’s at least about Jessica and not an expose on her partners family, which is different. The equivalent would be if it was the counts father"
well as I said, they did several articles about not only the count and his whole family and friends (they even listed his ex-girlfriends) but also about everybody that was around her and none was famous.
And that's a thing the DM does since forever, several actors/singers already talked about how invasive they are with people that are not in business but are close to them. Also DM doesn't give a shit about laws.
Another example would be Evan Rachel Wood when she was leaving a appointment and had the ultrasound of her baby in hand and they zoomed and put it in the main page of their site like "Exclusive! Evan's baby pic". Evan was pissed and demanded they took it down but they didn't and then she sued them because it was literally against the law to reveal private medical records of people and only THEN they took out.
There's also the famous case of the footballer Rooney's son, that was attending a game and Romney's team lost and they put in front page with a phrases implying the kid was upset with his father and everyone got pissed because not only they were using a kid for a feud they had with Ronney but also because it was illegal to put/use a kids face without blurring and without their parents consent since the child was not famous.
My point it's that it doesn't matter if it's unethical, a lie, or illegal, they will do it just for clicks.
HAHAHAHAHA that anon talking about "well at least it was just Jessica and not her boyfriends family" must be really joking because that man whole life was out there in several different articles. I remember because at the time I was into Jessica's work and every time I tried to search for news of new films the hundreds of articles about him on DM popped up.
No one it's obligated to know about DM practices but it's their thing to make articles about people that are not famous but are seen close to famous people, doesn't even have to be a romantic partner, they will lie and say whatever just to get a history that generate revenue, that's why they always have this "unnamed sources" bullshit. Several people sued them for this but they're are owned by big fish, unless there's laws regulations nothings gonna happen.
Post a Comment