Wednesday, November 18, 2020

Emma Watson and her boyfriend in London [November 18, 2020]

 




[Gallery] [Fashion] [Version française]





According to the Daily Mail, Emma and Leo were in Primrose Hill today. They also have a nice little story about the story coming from an "insider", which feels like the same story word for word as the ones they tell everytime she has a boyfriend.


If you have news to share (pictures, infos, scans...), please send an email to eden@emmawatson-updates.com Follow the blog:

151 comments:

Anonymous said...

Welp, seems like they're doing fine. Those pics with his hands on her shoulders are very sweet.

Emma tho, I'm sure some ethical company can make you a cruelty-free, 100% recycled, zero dolphins were annoyed fitted mask. Can't be having your nose hanging out like a dork.

Still, glad she exists and seems happy.

Julie said...

Yay! New photos. I have to agree, it's nice to at least see something.
Her mask looks cozy, but I'm going to assume that nose of hers was pretty chilly.

"zero dolphins were annoyed fitted mask."

Brilliant! LMAO!

Anonymous said...

Is there a ring in hisring finger, right hand ? Emma's fingers are covered with gloves ��

Anonymous said...

When did Emma describe her break-up with Matt as "horrendous"?? I don't recall her talkind about any of her relationships at all.

Anonymous said...

She looks sad.

Anonymous said...

Why is she wearing a mask in open space?

Anonymous said...

"She looks sad."



She's just read Eden's blog post. Then her fiance is trying to comfort her about 'Pottershots' etc closing.

Anonymous said...

Yay she is alive! I think she reads your blog eden and saw we were sad that she has been missing haha

She does look kind of somber but 2020 has been a hard year i cant fault her no one needs to smile all the time anyway.

Eden said...

"She's just read Eden's blog post. Then her fiance is trying to comfort her about 'Pottershots' etc closing."

YOU are the Daily Mail's "insider"! Admit it!

Anonymous said...

Fiance? Wow they must have called you to tell you the news lol

Anonymous said...

I thought England was in lockdown and only necessary businesses open. Are we sure these weren't taken before 2nd lockdown? I could be wrong because I don't live there. Regardless, if that many geniuses are going out just for coffee and wine, this will never get under control and did Leo really down a whole bottle of wine?! I liked Emma's bag until I saw it was $840. Oh well.

Anonymous said...

Nope. Cafes/restaurants etc are open for takeaways

Anonymous said...

Also it’s not wine, it’s a bottle of lemonade. Use your eyes and don’t believe what the DM tells you...

They both look great.

Anonymous said...

I made the mistake of reading DM comments those people have ugly souls so much hate

Anyway glad Emma is not hiding from us anymore at least.

Anonymous said...

"I stay at home for my diabetic mom and best friend who is in healthcare.". Oh wait...except for Ibiza and Italy and Ibiza again and coffee.

Anonymous said...

We’re allowed out! We’re supposed to be supporting the businesses that are open and she’s clearly following the rules. People were also allowed travel when she did. Italian and Spanish resorts were on UK tv asking people to come as they needed it to survive. She stayed home when people were not allowed to go out. How do people not understand this? Gods sake...

Anonymous said...

Except Spanish islands (when on UK safe list and they said they needed people to stay afloat), Italy (see previous) and coffee (when businesses have been allowed to do takeaways to help them survive and we are not restricted in the UK as to how many times we can go out, and we’re allowed out with members of our household or one person from another household as they’ve recognized the effect locking people up has on mental health).
The rules have been changing, you can’t hold someone to what they said in March when we were told to stay home. The government here has even done eat out to help out schemes since March. There’s a reason they’ve let cafes etc stay open for takeaways for this lighter lockdown this time, it’s so they don’t go under. Some people complain about everything.

Anonymous said...

"Italian and Spanish resorts were on UK tv asking people to come as they needed it to survive. "

The UK needed people to restart the economy even more tbh. I'm sure those massive swanky Italian resorts had enough millionaires helping them already... I wish she stayed with us and helped out some local hotel or getaway spots traveling to the worst-hit countries and all those people on beaches is what has brought us back to this mini lockdown I think.

Though its not just Emma fault but stupid governments let people out early and the 'eat out to help out' mess spread covid amongst the youth a lot...sigh :(

Anonymous said...

All of the people going out is what has made the pandemic worse. My 10 year old predicted what would happen. Are people mindless slaves that think just because the government says to go out, everything will be fine? Practice a little common sense and logical thought. We are in a 2nd lockdown because of people that behave like Emma has since June.

Anonymous said...

Criticizing her for sensibly following all covid guidance has reached new lows even for here.

Anonymous said...

Practice a little common sense and logical thought and go out safely and help someone save their business you complete clot...

Anonymous said...

I work for a small business and have had my hours cut back and have taken a hit financially as have many. At the same time, I am not so stupid as to lack the ability to think long term. Hmmm...Worldwide pandemic. It is still spreading despite lockdown. The rate has slowed, but it is still spreading worldwide...Still no vaccination... Hmm...let's all go on vacation and open everything again. What could possibly go wrong? Bunch of fools...

Anonymous said...

Only New Zealand seems to know what they are doing and have 100% control on things now. Other smaller island nations should have copied them looks like.

Anonymous said...

It will continue to spread until we find a vaccine. Boo you you’ve been hit financially, people are being made redundant left right and centre and hundreds of thousands of businesses are going to the wall. They cannot lock everyone up for a year. The economy would not survive it. At present the rules are to balance health vs people losing their homes. I’m happy to use my common sense, go for a walk and grab a cup of coffee off a local trader thanks.

Anonymous said...

I'm not the one who made the original comment about her getting coffee. I am fine with that and they were wearing masks and businesses like that and mine would not be around if not for that. I am talking about the vacations. People should be intelligent enough not to travel unnecessarily during a worldwide pandemic. That kind of behavior is why it spreads faster. Emma should know better. Unnecessary foreign travel should not have been allowed and if the government allows it, people like Emma should stop and think for themselves and decide if it is smart. It's not smart. It's stupid and now we are all paying the price again.

Anonymous said...

The only think i don't like about the pics is that it's obvious Luke Windsor has a deal with Daily Mail and he called the paps to "find her" getting coffee after the HP fans were dissapointed with her when she didn't show up in the HP virtual reunion, they're both staring to the camera. Also she looks sad (please don't deny it or call me something just because i pay attention to the details)

Anonymous said...

'She looks sad'

have you seen 2020 people? everyone is sad! stop over thinking things just a little while?

Anonymous said...

She has never looked happy with Leo. The first time in Italy, he looked bored/pissed and she looked ready to scold or admonish him. Their kiss was the most awkward thing I have ever seen. Almost like it was staged. She didn't look happy on their Valentine's trip, either. All the other times, they just look like friends and she looks either bored or sad. Maybe that is just how she looks. She used to look happier in the past though before she met him.

El Roberto said...

Eden:
"They also have a nice little story about the story coming from an "insider", which feels like the same story word for word as the ones they tell everytime she has a boyfriend."

Eden, I love your sarcasm.

Anonymous said...

The top rated comments on DM are relatively nice on an article about a woman, what’s happened the world? DM readers hate women, 2020 is throwing up some weird stuff...

Anonymous said...

It really seems reading is for the pros by now. There's an obvious difference between vaccination and vacation. I'm sure vaccination and vacation needed longer to develop, but in the end they will turn up.

Anonymous said...

"YOU are the Daily Mail's "insider"! Admit it!"

My pen is my sword



"The top rated comments on DM are relatively nice on an article about a woman, what’s happened the world? DM readers hate women, 2020 is throwing up some weird stuff..."

DM and similar site as well as youtube etc create and manipulate comments including likes and dislikes. DM does this to provoke a reaction and making you comment thus you end up staying the site longer generating more ad revenue.

Anonymous said...

Everyone isn't sad, many people find happy moments in this dark time with the virus

Anonymous said...

Hooray! She’s alive! Where is Primrose Hill? Somewhere near London I’m guessing?

Anonymous said...

She's young. It means...

Anonymous said...

"Those pics with his hands on her shoulders are very sweet. "

Given it's Primrose Hill he's probably comforting her that they are all out of yak's milk and she'll have to make do with goat's milk for her coffee.

Anonymous said...

Have any of the people stopped and considered that maybe that just her resting face? Just because somebody isn't smiling all the time it doesn't mean they aren't happy.And with the way 2020 has been going it's almost impossible to find somebody who can truely say they've been smiling everyday or every other day. I haven't been following Emma the way I used to a few years ago. But Emma doesn't seem to be the of person to stay in a relationship she doesn't want to be in.

Anonymous said...

Hi, Emma! It's been a while lol. Nice to see you.

But for real, kind of weird that it wasn't too long after the post about her not being around lol

Anonymous said...

So happy to know that she's okay. And.. Omg. How can someone looks younger at the age of 30?! �� just look at her face in those pict, she still looks like a teenager and so pretty.. ��

Anonymous said...

I loved that part too! So witty;-)

Anonymous said...

I guess this is our new Emma Watson whether we like it or not. An Executive and representative of Kering, showcasing who knows how many thousands of dollars worth of clothes and accessories just to get a cup of coffee. I hope she is happy. That is what counts.

Anonymous said...

They probably wouldn't let her in Primrose Hill dressed like she usually does when she goes out. No poor people allowed.(Sarcasm. Mostly.)

Anonymous said...

I agree about the new Emma Watson. Frankly, I like the old one better. This isn't the same person who went to Bangladesh and shed tears over the conditions that she saw making the clothes and even helped them make some of them. She then vowed to fight against that type of thing and to make sure she would do what she can to put an end to it and improve their lives. She did the same type of thing in Zambia. Fast forward a few years and she is a top exec at a company that relies on that very type of labor for a great many of their products. Her salary is paid for by the labor of the type of people she used to shed tears with and she goes around showing off all the overpriced Kering crap. What happened? I don't know, but she is not the same person and I find it sad, but it is her life and I wish her health and happiness.

Fp said...

I think that there are too negative comments here... Emma is a very smart person,she cares about others and she is such a wonderful activits. We should not judge her and because she is Emma Watson but because she is a human being.
I am sure that with Kering Emma is going to make huge and important changments, I am sure that with her upcoming book about the London Map that will be published on March 2021 she will help many people...
The important, to me, is that she remains who she is. That she is happy. And healthy. Emma is Emma.

Anonymous said...

Putting where she lives on here isn’t wise...

Anonymous said...

To anon, Kering is the most sustainable luxury group, and you can improve things within it. It’s very hard to improve from outside.

Anonymous said...

I don't think some of you quite understand what Emma will be doing at Kering. Saying that they are the most sustainable fashion company is like bragging about not being quite as bad of a criminal as someone else. Emma will be overseeing the push to sustainability of the production of their products and the company as a whole. None of this she is qualified for, of course, but it looks good for Kering. Emma will be the face, so to speak and attend meetings and conferences, while, as usual, people who are actually qualified and know what they are doing will be behind the scenes doing all the actual work. It has nothing to do with making the lives of the labor force better. Every company these days has to say that they are pushing for sustainability or they will lose business. It is all about making and saving money which increases profits and share prices.
EMMA OWNS THIS. This is not about bettering the lives of the people or the millions of animals that Kering slaughters every year for their products. Emma is overseeing sustainability of ALL their products. This includes animal products. She may not be there when they are made, but she will oversee how they are produced in an effort to make it better for the environment as if killing millions of animals is good for the environment. None of her work will benefit labor. It is all about materials used in the production of the products and the slave labor(mostly women) will continue.
I don't know if Emma shut down her instagram because she was getting slammed for her hypocrisy or if Kering asked her to, but this is a betrayal of everything she used to stand for. Companies like LVMH and Kering are devils if such a thing exists. This is why so many people are upset about it. They feel betrayed and lied to and Kering and all of its shit are what Emma now represents. That is sad.

Anonymous said...

This isn't the same person who went to Bangladesh and shed tears over the conditions that she saw making the clothes and even helped them make some of them
Bangladeshi here, and lol. I couldn't stop laughing at that story.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone know what's Leo's profession?? I mean, does he even work at all?? lol I know it sound like envy, and there's some truth in it but, really, he seems to spend a lot of time with Emma in Europe.

Anonymous said...

Esta gente del blog de odio regresó la critican por su fama, por su actuación por su activismo y ahora que tiene un trabajo fuera de la industria cinematográfica sin redes sociales solo haciendo su vida como una empresaria en Kering totalmente en silencio,la gente que la odia la sigue criticando dios eso es agotador lo peor es que no si quiera saben que es lo que Emma está haciendo pero ya la critican.
Criticonas del blog de odio espero y se muerdan la lengua con su veneno.

Anonymous said...

Leo is from a very wealthy family and inherited a lot of money as a result and was smart enough to use it to invest in companies taking advantage of a bunch of idiots with more money than brains in the Los Angeles area and made money in high end cannabis and accessories, art, etc. He sold his share of the cannabis business in June of last year and just seems to be living the high life with Emma. Maybe he still has a job. I don't know, but if their relationship is to continue it is either going to have to be long distance or he will have to move to London because that is where Emma will be working.

Anonymous said...

Leo is certainly one very lucky guy dating one of the most beautiful actresses of our generation! I hope he is making her happy!

Anonymous said...

I see her well and she's been with Leo for a year now, they look so good together.
I am supporting you TeamEmmaAndLeo

Anonymous said...

I have been wondering why the Instagram got shut down and why there has been nothing on her Twitter account. I really hope it is not because of Kering. I have an aunt who just retired as an Executive Assistant for a wealthy businessman in Chicago(Aon) and all the board members were under instructions to be careful what they put on social media because they represent the company and they don't want to offend the clientele. Most of them have private social media accounts as a result and that is where they are free to voice their real thoughts.
Kering has an extremely wealthy clientele made up of mostly super wealthy white conservatives and the rich Hollywood type. The rich, white conservatives are the base and with Emma being famous and now representing Kering, some of her views and posts and activism could offend the base clientele(stupid, I know).
Hopefully that is not why it was shut down. Maybe she was just tired of it and needed a break.

Anonymous said...

Emma looks great, still like a teenager; he also looks nice.
However it's a staged press opportunity.
Emma alone or Emma+her PR team are playing a game with the press/social media. C'est la vie...

Anonymous said...

Sometimes I wonder if it is staged. The Daily Mail conveniently had an advertisement for Emma's Gucci bag and an article ready to go practically as soon as the pictures were taken.

Anonymous said...

Haha. That bag is funny. The real thing is $840 and the knockoffs are under $75. They don't say "Gucci" though...

Anonymous said...

Yes Leo does work. He does pretty well for himself. He advises people starting up businesses or people who want to turn around struggling businesses. He also invests in businesses.

Anonymous said...

My vote is she just wanted to take a break from social media. Kering would have known Emma’s views and public profile when they hired her, and they wouldn’t be any more limiting then what she’s had had to commit to representing the UN as a Goodwill Ambassador. The idea she’s taking a general break from it is also reflected in that her private Instagram account is extremely quiet compared to what it was she hadn’t posted in yonks, and the quietness has been since around the same time she used to post lots, the couples account activity has also comparatively slowed since the same time. It’s clearly a conscious decision across her life at the moment, not just her public profile.

Anonymous said...

Leo probably works for some venture capitalist firm and they look at start up companies and if they look promising, they provide equity for a share of the profits over a given time and same thing with struggling companies. If the brains at the firm think they can be turned around, they provide cash in exchange for a cut of future profits. He also got a bunch of money from his families wealth and made money in weed and art and things. His family money is where it all came from to begin with. My guess is that he is the " money man" so to speak because these guys pour over company papers and spend time at their businesses before deciding to invest money and he hasn't seemed to be in the USA the last year, so I don't know how he could do anything other than provide cash.

Anonymous said...

Where are you getting this inherited money from? They’re well off but not that wealthy by California standards, he wouldn’t stand out. He’s made money by starting small businesses with friends after colleague that did well, he did those at first in conjunction with doing normal jobs, he waited tables etc., he built up rep for starting good businesses (bike rentals, property, design, weed) and then continued founding or growing businesses (the weed accessories business), obviously that fact that he was well enough off to begin with helped him but he’s not a trust fund kid or one that’s gone into a family business. He’s works with companies on strategy and the vast majority of the work he does would be perfectly doable via a laptop and zoom, his job would be hardly affected, he can work from anywhere.

Anonymous said...

All Leo’s family work, they all have pretty semi-normal jobs. His parents did well enough for themselves and now are retired and have a home and a small holiday home in Mexico. They would be very comfortable financially but hardly Bay Area rich. From what I’ve seen of his work experience online he worked through school/college like a normal person. He’s a well off person (especially now) but he’s hardly a rich playboy with daddy’s money. He owns business and invests in others so he makes a very good living and he seems as said to be able to take his laptop and work from most places. I’d be surprised if he didn’t get a visa and start advising businesses in London but he could just as easily work with his US businesses from the UK. You don’t need to be physically there to evaluate a business at all.

Anonymous said...

I never said he was a trust fund kid and I should not have used the word "inherited" because that makes it sound like some distant relative left him money or something. I just meant that he has a wealthy family and used money from that to get into business, which is exactly what he has done. I have no problem with him or making money. But lets be honest. If you can make that type of money from laptop and Zoom meetings, other people are the brains behind the operation.

Anonymous said...

Why do people care about how he makes a living?

Anonymous said...

Not super wealthy by California standards, but still have a vacation home in Mexico. Not wealthy by California standards still probably puts them in the top 1% of the world. Some of you need to come to the other side of the tracks if you think that isn't that wealthy.

Anonymous said...

I make my money from a laptop and zoom meetings and am the brains of my operation. What are on earth are you talking about with that he needs other people? The vast majority of business and advising business nowadays is digital. What else would he need other than a laptop? If he’s advising business on strategy he only needs their modeling, operational processes and finances to assess the business, find holes, change tact, re-collaborate supply chains etc. He doesn’t have to sit with them watch them do it. No business lawyer sits with a client like that, no financial advisor either, why would a business consultant? Pre-covid if you can go into a business and meet them in person great, but you absolutely don’t need to. He founds and advises businesses across different areas, that’s what he does. He doesn’t work for some massive operation pouring gazillions into stuff.

Anonymous said...

People care about how he makes a living because how someone makes a living and spends their money says a great deal about them. Most of his wealth has come from taking advantage of the excesses of society-people that think they need thousands of dollars worth of pointless accessories to smoke weed or overpriced artwork and all that kind of stuff. He then uses the wealth to live the lifestyle of excess himself-constant vacations, ridiculously priced clothes and so on. He and Emma are free to live and do as they please, but the human race will never reach a state of peace until the extreme excess stops. Some people have to care because obviously others don't.

Anonymous said...

I believe that the point being made was that he wouldn’t stand out as being privileged and a trust fund kid in California, he’d be pretty normal in a lot of it so whilst he had a very good start he’s played some part in earning his money (otherwise trust fund kids would have the best businesses), not that he wouldn’t be wealthy if you moved him to other parts of the world.
At a minimum he’s at least kind of smart.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone know which university Leo graduated from? Ivy League or UCLA?

Anonymous said...

Not the person who posted about Leo's money, but as an evil venture capitalist myself, anyone who doesn't personally meet with business owners and tour company facilities or have a trusted colleague do it, is a fool. Companies, particularly ones struggling that need capital and are desperate for it love to hide things and can't be trusted to send all the company books by computer or tell you everything about the business. You can't possibly grasp why they need help or why they might or might not be a successful startup without knowing them, their key employees, production facilities, etc. Businesses are run by people in the real world in real facilities, not on a computer and you can never grasp the complexities of a business in order to make an educated decision on an investment from a computer. Anyone doing it all by zoom or laptop either has too much money to burn or is dealing with such small investments that a failure is no big deal.

Anonymous said...

I think you’ll find that most businesses nowadays run from computers. How and where the business is run and whether that is in a facility depends wholly on the type of business and industry. You don’t need to physically be there unless it’s a manufacturing business etc. business is global, I don’t sit with clients, but I know them, I have to. If you’re traveling everywhere, you’re wasting everyone’s time and money...

Anonymous said...

If you need to see physical bricks and mortar every time you invest in a business, that’s a very archaic way of doing things that might not always be necessary depending on the type of business. People don’t hide the problems in the store cupboard. Due diligence happens on online datarooms. Covid has also proved beyond doubt that you can form valuable relationships without physically meeting people. You still have to put in the time, nobody is saying you don’t, you have to get to know them and the business, but being in the same room isn’t necessary.

Anonymous said...

They don’t tell you everything in person either. No amount of tours will do the data digs.

Anonymous said...

You all either are not venture capitalists and are pretending to be or deal with very small investments or just tiny startups. Or, perhaps, different businesses that can be dealt with by computer. You have to understand the human factor. People with real personalities and work habits run businesses. Companies succeed or fail because of people. Anyone can be someone they are not by computer. You have to get to know them and their key employees before making large investments and understand them and their work environment. They are your real investment. Otherwise, you are setting yourself up for failure. Yes, they can hide stuff and that is why contracts are strictly worded for such things by overpaid lawyers and in the end you may not be able to prove anything. That is why in person contact is vital. Taking classes on understanding body language is also a huge help. I'm afraid the days of everything being done by computer for large capital investments is not here yet. Small investments, maybe, but not large ones.

Anonymous said...

Or you’re pretending to be a venture capitalist or are just old fashioned. Businesses fail for a myriad of reasons and businesses are valuable for a myriad of reasons.

Anonymous said...

Same anon as right above - You can’t judge someone’s career, expertise or business acumen just because they do it might it remotely.

Anonymous said...

As I clearly stated in my first post, I was not the one commenting on Leo or how he makes his money. I was responding to someone who said venture capitalism could be done all by computer. I have no idea what kind of investments Leo is making, nor do I care. I wish I lived where weed was legal and had some rich, stoned dumbasses to make money off of. Good for him. If he is dealing with tiny investments and basic startups or he has help in the States, he could do his part by computer. It doesn't matter to me. I simply wanted to correct some inaccuracies. Regardless, I have said what I have to say and am done.

Anonymous said...

For some people here, venture capitalism clearly can be done by computer and people were just pointing their opinion out to you. Suspecting someone is making small investments or that the people they’re making money off are stoned just because they may do it differently to you is a bit immature. With respect if you wrote the book on the exclusive method for how to do successful venture capitalism, you probably wouldn’t be on here, leaving room open for difference rather than viewing them as “inaccuracies” might be good. Just my two cents.

Anonymous said...

Very first Anon back again. You know, with the No-Dolphins-Were-Annoyed Masks.

Boy howdy did this escalate quickly! First into judgy nonsense about Emma's new career and then into judgy nonsense about Leo's career and now we have a venture capitalist who spends his time not venture capitaling posting on celeb watch sites!

Look folks, there is no ethical consumption under late-stage capitalism. There's no ethical working for any corporation, especially a large one. Including a movie studio. It's not great to be the silver spoon kid of a wealthy family and work in weed distribution, and it's not awesome to be the daughter of two lawyers (one of whom owns a freaking vineyard in Italy), afford to go to the Dragon School, and have a chance to play Hermione Granger and be a millionairess by 12. Because the whole system is built on exploitation and inequality.

But most people are just not conditioned to really worry about upending the entire unjust system so they do the best they can within their means and try to ignore the ways any lifestyle in this system, prosperous or otherwise, makes you complicit in abuse.

Is it super great that Emma works for Kering in any way? No. But it wasn't great when she worked for Harvey Weinstein, either. And she still took time out of what could be a purely luxurious life to try and be at least a symbol of proactive, forward-thinking behavior.

I don't know about Leo other than to be 100% sure he says "Namaste" to his pot dealer. But he's handsome and left-leaning and seems to make her happy.

There are no super great ethical rich people, because just by being rich in this system, they're unethical even before they pick jobs. But if Captain of Industry Venture Capitalist here is worried about Leo, he could be an arms dealer or gig economy tech bro like Brendan Wallace.

So long as Emma's rich, she won't be some earth angel. So just chill with the career judginess and enjoy your produce picked by migrants making pennies on the dollar.

Anonymous said...

Jesus, people. The venture gal/ guy never said anything bad about Leo and said some venture stuff could be done by computer and just wanted to say how some of it is still done. The person came off as a bit of prick, but practice some reading comprehension. And why the hell are we arguing about this? We are all quarantined and bored, I guess.

Anonymous said...

They just went out for coffee/lemonade and a walk. How did this become into a discussion of how Leo works and Emma's position at Kering

Anonymous said...

To the person with the long post above, I think the problem some people have with Emma working at Kering is that Emma has a choice. She is in a position financially to work at many different places or no place and she chose a company that is among the worst in the West in their human and animal welfare record. Most people in the world have to take whatever job they can get to feed themselves or their family. Emma is not one of those people and her new choice of profession flies in the face of all her years of activism and many of us are left wondering if she is just a fake.

Anonymous said...

I'm going to go on a lim and say that nobody here (myself included) personally knows Emma or Leo. Therefore none of us know what their personalities or relationship is like. And it's not our place to dictate if Emma is still the same person she was when she was a teenager (when she went to Bangladesh). So to assume she doesn't care or that she's "fake" is purely that an assumption. I'm not defending Emma or Leo here, but I'm also not going to make pass judgements on 2 complete and utter stranger either.

Anonymous said...

Bruh... I'm not even a huge fan of Emma. But I saw the post and thought it was good to see her and her boyfriend(they're cute together). I thought y'all would be happy to get some kind of news about her. Yet y'all are ready to bite eachothers head off. Making all kinds of judgments about somebody I'm willing to bet y'all don't personally know. Like damn they just went for a drink and a walk in the park.

CK said...

I don’t understand how’s the above discussion going..
As a fans of Emma, seeing a new pic of her and knowing(guessing) she’s doing ok is happy enough for me. Any updates on her is rare, let’s simply try to appreciate that.

Btw thanks Eden for the updates.

Anonymous said...

Except she didn't do that weird ass phototshoot with the DM for her fans, she did it for the same reason she did that photoshoot in that lingerie shop or that Vogue video on her bag. She sells something. It's all what she cares about. But I do appreciate she's back home and not on holiday.

Anonymous said...

She looks pregnant which is probably why she has been seen smoking for a while.

Anonymous said...

She doesn’t smoke...

Anonymous said...

Same anon as right above - my apologies I shouldn’t have replied, on review that’s clearly a trolling comment.

Anonymous said...

There are two Emma Watson's. There is the carefully constructed fabrication of her and her PR team that looks at interviewers questions and tells them they cannot interview her unless they strike those questions and sets up Instagram Press Tours and photo shoots for magazines and makes sure she is photographed with all the right people at UN meetings and those pictures go public, etc., etc. Then there is the real Emma Watson and we know her from paparazzi photos and Panama Paper leaks and then we know what she really is: a multi millionaire, several home owning, monthly vacation taking woman that completely clashes with the words and tweets and image of the other Emma Watson. She says she feels like an imposter. I can only imagine why.

El Roberto said...

"a multi millionaire, several home owning, monthly vacation taking woman"
this, 'per se', isn't a bad thing. Don't blame her for having time and money to go on vacation. That's a result of an unequal system, and not her fault in general.
And it seems to me to be a more healthy Emma.
All these people blaming her for enjoying life and feeling worth herself to buy things with her money should really take a look at themselves and ask themselves if they really would do better if they were in the same position. I really doubt that.
And don't blame her for concentrating also on different things than suboptimal things to change in this world. If you solely concentrate on suboptimal things, you get insane.
Sometimes I think some of you need to grow up. You only've got one life.

For myself, I still think she tries to do her best.
Most important thing is to get happy in life, without harming others, of course.

The comment from the anon is funny. She got pregnant, so she started smoking again. Okay, really makes sense. :-O  *laughing-about-this-stuff*

Anonymous said...

"There are two Emma Watson's. There is the carefully constructed fabrication of her and her PR team that looks at interviewers questions and tells them they cannot interview her unless they strike those questions and sets up Instagram Press Tours and photo shoots for magazines and makes sure she is photographed with all the right people at UN meetings and those pictures go public, etc., etc. Then there is the real Emma Watson and we know her from paparazzi photos and Panama Paper leaks and then we know what she really is: a multi millionaire, several home owning, monthly vacation taking woman that completely clashes with the words and tweets and image of the other Emma Watson. She says she feels like an imposter. I can only imagine why."


BOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

Anonymous said...

Damn I'm not even Emma's fan I just accidently clicked on the link. But y'all who are her supposedly her "fans" are literally ready to bite her head off for litterally anything. I went through some other posts on here. Some of y'all are even worse than people in the Daily Mail comments for most stories . Like damn the article said her boyfriend tried to keep their relationship private. That doesn't mean look into his and his family's personal life. And then make judgements as to who he or they are(I'm assuming that nobody here actually knows either of them). And what is it with y'all and getting mad that Emma is well off, therefore lives and goes about things the way that she does. Like sis didn't chose the family she was born into or what their economic background would be like. She was 1 out of millions of girls who auditioned for Hermione (any of them could of gotten the role instead). And nobody knew that Harry Potter would blow up this much back then. Y'all are getting into long ass debates because of she was born into a high middle class family and then worked in one way of another to make her own money since she was 10??? Does it suck that most of us will never reach the amount of money in her bank account... Yes. Is it her fault that the cost of living and items in general has gone up but wages haven't, No. She and her boyfriend went to get a drink(following the rules around Covid for now). And hasn't even started a job yet, and most of y'all are already assuming she's fake. Kering is actually one of the most sustainable corporations compared to their counterparts. Can Emma change or erase any fucked up shit Kering has done in the past, No. But she can try to help find more economically better options for the way certain things are done. The litteral reason as to why they even hired her in the first place.And before y'all start with the carbon footprint thing. If you have any kind of electronic device,a car or live in any type of building... guess what you also have one. And if she was pregnant I'm sure she has more than enough common sense to not smoke through her pregnancy

Anonymous said...

So welcome anybody to hasn't been here before... On today's episode of people in the comments having long ass debates that have no correlation with Eden's actual post. We have... checks notes... Emma and Leo going out with masks for a drink and a walk in the park.
Let's go to the comment section

-10 percent: comments are actually related to post
-The rest of the comment section:

*Discussing a complete and utter strangers (Leo) family and economic background(which is creepy seeing as I'm willing to bet he never personally told y'all that information) And kinda fucked up especially when anybidy who even likes Emma knows how much she values her privacy.

* Method in which way he works(that only he and people he has worked with would know)

*The fact that Emma was born into a high middle class family and was choosen out of millions of other girls of a part in HP. A movie that underestimated for how much it would blow up. Therefore,yes she's well off and no most of us will never have that much money in our bank accounts

*Hating her for a job she hasn't even started yet. Because Kering isn't that sustainable even though they're one of the most sustainable corporations at their level. So Emma was brought in as a boardroom person to find better ways to be sustainable in the future

* Strangers assuming that another stranger (Emma) is apparently "fake" even though I'll bet money that nobody here knows her personally now or did back then. Therefore that assumption doesn't really have the legs some of y'all think it does,it's just an opinion. Who knows maybe I'm wrong. But then again I don't go around assuming people are fake without actually having proof and knowing them in real life

-Did I miss anything?

Anonymous said...

Bruh she's had Imposter Syndrome since she was a teenager... Literally before anything you mentioned even happened. And Imposter Syndrome (I'm paraphrasing here) not believing your worthy of any achievement you've had. No matter how much time and work went into it. Not being an actual imposter

Anonymous said...

Good God! People aren't mad about Kering not being sustainable. No big companies are. It is the slave labor, including children that make their shit and the millions of animals slaughtered by their company to become hand bags and purses. Their human rights and animal welfare record is atrocious. This is why people are upset, not the sustainability factor. Emma has spent her adult life preaching against this stuff and is now on the Board of Directors of a company that is one of the biggest violators of human and animal rights. Most of the slave labor is women, by the way. It is hypocrisy plain and simple. You don't have to personally know Emma to figure that out.

Anonymous said...

"Damn I'm not even Emma's fan I just accidently clicked on the link."


Then proceeds to go on a rant sticking up for Emma....

Anonymous said...

" Emma has spent her adult life preaching against this stuff"


Then drops it and moves on to another en-vogue topic. Just like the media does in general.

Anonymous said...

She can change kering’s practices more being a senior part of it than she ever could standing on the outside whining about it. Companies like Kering are not going away, we need to work with them to make them better. Saying you’re a hypocrite just because you work for them is very naive, companies are very rarely all good or all bad.
Also to people saying she won’t have started yet. Of course she’s started, she’d have started when she was appointed as a director. She’ll have started remotely like everyone in this pandemic has. Being director of a company like that isn’t a 9 to 5 clock in and out of the office job.

Anonymous said...

For any avoidance of doubt...

Emma Watson was appointed as a Director of Kering at the Combined General Meeting on June 16, 2020. Her term of office will expire at the Annual General Meeting called to approve the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023.

So she was ratified in June and would have started pretty much immediately after that. But as someone said before, people are often directors of multiple companies (she herself is a director of multiple organizations), the amount of time this one takes up depends how much she’s involved in day to day. She’ll be more involved than some directors due to her dual role also chairing a committee. I’d imagine at the start she’ll spend the vast majority of her time on it, but then ease off a bit and balance it more with other stuff as she gets more comfortable. She hasn’t let her other directorships, her UN role or her role with LMH go at the moment, though UN will be quieter at the moment as she’s finished with the EU Gender Council. She seems to like juggling a variety of stuff, which she’s done well enough so far. I’d imagine if the right acting role came up (like with little women) in a year or two (not right now she’s too new with kering and the acting industry is still a complete mess with covid) she’d do it, but equally the UN could launch another committee etc. she’s clearly going with what interests her.

Anonymous said...

Once again, Emma's position has nothing to do with the company labor. It is about changing over many of the materials they use to recycled, organic or more environmentally friendly. She cannot and will not do any good for their slave labor force or mistreated animals because that is not her department and they rely on that labor to make the obscene profits they make. Emma's job is to help sustainability, which as a side effect will lower production costs and they can then charge the same or more for the products and make more profit.
Use a search engine and look at the conditions these people work and live in that work for Kering. Look at the conditions the animals live in that exist to be someone's fur coat or purse. Mink, chinchilla, alligator, rattlesnake, rabbit, they have them all. Over 20 million mink(not an exaggeration) have had to be euthanized at mink farms in Europe and the American West because they contracted the coronavirus. Kering owns a lot of these farms. Now, it is not their fault that they got the coronavirus, but it shows how many animals exist just so some rich person can wear them. The mink will be bred and killed by the millions again when this all passes. These suffering people and animals are what Kering represents. This is what all the big executives like Emma turn a blind eye to in their ivory tower headquarters. Emma was brought in for one reason and one reason only and that is to feed the beast. Some of you need to stop kidding yourself otherwise.

Anonymous said...

To anon who asked if they forgot something...
Some anons think Imposter Syndrome meant that somebody was apparently an actual imposter... When in reality (I'm paraphrasing)it means that the person with Imposter Syndrome isn't convinced that they deserve whatever they have achieved. It doesn't matter how much time or effort went into said task. They have a hard time believing they deserve any praise for their work or achievements in general.

Anonymous said...

The fact that they thought the comments were that bad is saying something though... And most people in the comments were ranting anyways...

Anonymous said...

oh dear getting vibes of the goblin greta from her attire

Anonymous said...

She no longer works with the UN after the Panama papers leak, She went to Paris to meet Macron because he and his wife invited her to the Council Gender meeting because of her feminist activist image. It was all PR

Anonymous said...

She's still named as one of their ambassadors. She just doesn't do He for She anymore. Because that was a 3 year contract I guess. Anne Hathaway has has that position since 2017. However Anne's "contract is for the LGBT+

Anonymous said...

More trolling with last two comments, honestly don’t people have better things to do... Eden must be so patient filtering comments like these normally...

Anonymous said...

Sorry I meant her and Anne were the ambassadors but Emma's contract was up in 2017. Anne started in 2016 but also left in 2017

Anonymous said...

Emma is still a UN goodwill ambassador, just not for HeForShe.

Anonymous said...

Yes she's still named as one of their ambassadors in the website because she worked for them, they won't erase her name because she wasn't fired officially but she hasn't attend any official UN event since the end of 2016

Anonymous said...

Dude name one celeberity ambassador that is at most public events

Anonymous said...

Not attending one single event =/= She should attend many events

Anonymous said...

To the person going off about Kering's human and animal rights record, I'm with you, but you forgot to add coyote, raccoon, dog, fox, rabbit, karakul, and a few others to the list of animals these sick people farm and kill for fur coats and things.

Anonymous said...

I'm just curious does Emma get paid to do the Kering thing? Or is it just like a volunteer thing? Sorry if it's a stupid question

Anonymous said...

"I'm just curious does Emma get paid to do the Kering thing?"

Most definitely paid.

Kering's fees for 2019 were roughly between €66,000 & €104,000 for each individual diector.

Emma will also receive an additional €23,000 for chairing the sustainability committee.
Hey and she'll probably get an employee's discount on her expensive handbags as well.

Anonymous said...

"More trolling with last two comments, honestly don’t people have better things to do... Eden must be so patient filtering comments like these normally..."


Not trolling but the truth.

Anonymous said...

"ambassador" = a few PR press conferences, publicity stunts and all expenses and salary paid by 'donations'

Anonymous said...

"I'm just curious does Emma get paid to do the Kering thing? Or is it just like a volunteer thing? Sorry if it's a stupid question"

Yep and tax free. All stars do it not just Emma.

Eden said...

"More trolling with last two comments, honestly don’t people have better things to do... Eden must be so patient filtering comments like these normally..."

Under pretty every single post, there's a person (probably the same conspiracy theory lover every time) commenting about "PR move". In their mind, there's not a single thing Emma does that's genuine. Paparazzi photos? Emma paid them. Emma on a list of influencing people? Her publicist paid them. And so on. Boring.

Anonymous said...

Paparazzi photos? Emma paid them.

well celebs do that all the time tbf. you have to watch for the logo on the original images and see what company it is if ist freelancers it wasn't paid for but if it says like 'Backgrid' that's a company that gets hired by celebs to take shots for them.

I've not looked to see if Emma has any shots from 'Backgrid' these new ones are from LV media not heard of them before.

Anonymous said...

One thing that big companies like Kering do to hide how much their Executives get paid because it would piss people off, is to hide most of their income in bonuses and especially stock options. I guarantee with those, Emma will be in the 7 figures every year with this job. They always make the base salary look low(relatively speaking).

Anonymous said...

lol It's so funny how some people think this photos were taken because they complained here in the blog about her absense on the Tom Felton stream event. Really?? I don't really think this photos are staged either, no celeb would arrange a fake situation like this so close from where they actually live.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, I love how these companies try to hide how much their big boys and girls make. Like anyone is really naive enough to think that these directors at a Fortune 500 company really only make around $100,000 USD a year. A Wal-Mart store manager makes more than that and Wal-Mart isn't exactly known for paying well.

Anonymous said...

Not here, on social media and there are articles talking about that also look at how Daily Mail promoted the Gucci bag she's wearing (one of the brands that Kering owns), there aren't paps outside a coffee shop if someone doesn't calls them especially in London

Anonymous said...

The idea that Emma calls the paps is nonsense. Photographers will be around primrose hill. Further Backgrid are just a photo agency it doesn’t mean anyone called them. Emma will be wearing her brands products all the time now, pap or not. The DM has people and software to identify fashion items. Also the bag is pretty distinctive, they wouldn’t need to be told what it is.

Anonymous said...

I think the most likely scenario is that it is probably in Emma's contract with Kering that she can only wear brands from their companies in public because it looks good for them if she is photographed with them and so she had a very bright, conspicuous bag compared to the rest of her outfit(probably on purpose so it would be noticed)and the Daily Mail picked up on it and ran an advertisement for it, which, obviously they get paid for. The bag will probably sell out soon, just like the suit she wore at the UN meeting with Macron did after the Daily Mail also ran an advert for it. Emma will likely get any Kering stuff for free. They are just using her like others have said and love the exposure. There are many shallow people in this world who will buy something just because a celebrity wore it. Face it, she is now just a walking advert for Kering.

Anonymous said...

Backgrid is the company celebs call on themselves it took 20secs to google them and find this info but anyway theres nothing wrong with Emma doing this imo its just part of being famous sometimes your PR team wants your name in headliens if you have been quiet for awhile whats wrong with that? anyone with a problem is just getting worked up as they have nothing better to do, just haters really.

Anonymous said...

backgrid is like getty. They just buy up pics other people take.

It's not to say no celeb photos are staged, but backgrid isn't some magical celeb secret paparazzi photoshoot company.

Anonymous said...

You mean you googled and got unsubstantiated rumours? How surprising. Backgrid is just a regular photo agency like any other photo agency. Exact same. There’s no magic thing where a Backgrid photo means it’s set up. People need to stop talking out their arse. Some celebs can always call any photo agency for photos but only the PR blowback if this got found out wouldn’t be worth it for most of them, z list celebs take the risk but it bites most celebrities in the arse at some point. People need to stop thinking an agency equals staged. It’s BS.

Anonymous said...

These new shots are from LV Media so not sure why Backgrid got brought up but yes most pap shots these days are staged. Famous people no longer have to deal with being chased by paps outside there house or in some private location that often as they all have deals to have shots done on their terms and no longer are paps in control.

(Of course freelancers will stile be pigs and snap anything they can but the pros no longer do it that way) good article on such things here.

I don't think Emma calls them often and only set of really staged pap shots she has were with that actor from Glee which was a PR relationship imo (.)cosmopolitan(.)com/entertainment/celebs/q-and-a/a60015/paparazzo-explains-staged-celebrity-photos/

Anonymous said...

You always get the occasional pap around some residential areas in London walking around, always. But due to restaurants, bars and nightclubs being closed or takeaway only, and the shops being closed again, they can’t hang outside their usual Mayfair, soho and Kensington haunts. The amount of photos that are going up on the DM of people having coffee or going for walks suggest they are pretty much camped in places like Hampstead, Camden, primrose hill etc. at the moment. In fairness they are trying to earn a living but lying in bushes with a long lens or on the backseat of a parked car (which they do when they want to get close) to get coffee photos must be even more depressing than usual for them. But the DM needs content is paying for them, even giving exclusive money for them to try and ensure they have enough content. One pap probably waited hours and got lucky with Emma in primrose hill. He might have got a couple of others that day as well if he waited long enough.

Anonymous said...

Paps are thankfully dying out these days more and more not just because of deals actors have behind the scenes but since the average person now has ultra high-quality cameras on their phone and mostly can post any pics of celebs they run into straight to social media for free and have really taken the work of paps away. Though im not sure if random members of the public having such an easy way to post location of celebs is any better than paps who at least have to wait a few hours to sell the pics to papers or whatever.

Anonymous said...

I don't think she staged the photos, but like others have said, she is Kering's new billboard so she will be decked out in their stuff in case the paparazzi are around. She made sure that bag stood out.

Anonymous said...

Dude it's yellow, the bag would've stood out even with no paparazzi around

Anonymous said...

Is it just me,or are the people who think that literally every think Emma does or doesn't do is staged. Are also the ones who think Emma is now "fake". When in reality I'm pretty sure none of us know her personally, therefore it isn't really our place to say whether or not she's changed.

Anonymous said...

What people are saying is that she chose the bright yellow bag with big Gucci logos on it so it would get noticed whether paparazzi were there or not and people would know what brand it was. If the paparazzi are there, even better. She is advertising for Kering. As far as being fake, when you go around preaching things and then do the exact opposite of what you preach, you are a fake and a hypocrite. You don't have to know the person personally. Their actions are enough. Look, I am Emma's age and I grew up loving her, but she is a fake. Sorry.

Anonymous said...

Emma has always vowed to fight against things like exploitation of children and women, slave labor conditions like she witnessed in Bangladesh, mistreatment, abuse and killing of animals, so forth and so on. Kering is guilty of all those things to such a degree that they are constantly cited for them and do nothing to fix it. Instead of fighting against them, Emma is fighting for them. She is helping them make more money. That should tell you all you need to know.

Anonymous said...

I don't care what they think of Emma or not, I love her and will always love her because she is a human being and since we are all not perfect.

Stop looking at someone else's eye and look at yourselves, envy does not lead you to anything good.

Anonymous said...

You already have your hate blog but what need do you have to come to a fan blog to exaggerate and put sizaña in almost every publication, why do you hate it so much? Why are you so obsessed with Emma? your obsession seems that of a psychopath. Talk about her private and public life about her boyfriend, her new job, her performance of every word she said before, let's see if you would like them to analyze everything you say and scrub it all the time, I definitely would not like Knowing you are the worst person and you don't realize it.

Anonymous said...

Uhh. Who is the above comment talking to?

Anonymous said...

Most celebrities stage and work with DM or other gossip rags for PR. Emma works with DM to promote stuff, in this case her Gucci bag or this summer it was that lingerie boutique. It's not big deal usually, it's how PR works but in Emma's case I think it's pretty fair to have a opinion on it has she complains about "fame", She refuses to do photos with her fans but she's okay doing shoots with DM. And, more importantly, she's been promoting herself as that great feminist and activist for years and yet works for Kerring now and stopped doing her "free" activism (i.e. her book club). I like Emma but she's a public figure who makes money from people, so it's fair to criticise her (as long as it's not insulting and for real reasons).

Anonymous said...

"The idea that Emma calls the paps is nonsense."


No her people do it but on this occasion she didn't. To be fair it's rare but we all remember Chad don't we? That was fake as fuck. There was also those beach pictures arrangement in return of keeping her ex George? drug taking out of the press. I think that was around 2015?? So yeh, it happens but it's rare with Emma really.

Anonymous said...

I think some of us need to face reality. To echo what others have said, she is nothing more than an image. You have to keep in mind that probably 99% of her fans and the Universe don't know about the paparazzi pics and stuff we get here. They just get the image from her former social media accounts and PR pictures. The image is the Emma Watson that posts about how she is staying home to stop the spread of Covid for her mother and best friend. She makes it look like she is doing it voluntarily to set an example and look good. The reality is, everyone including her knew a full lockdown was coming in a couple days and it wasn't really voluntary. When the lockdown was over and Covid was still spreading and she actually could voluntarily stay home and set an example, did she? Hell no. Literally the second you could leave, she was back on her monthly vacation cycle. 99% of people don't know that. They just get the image Emma and her people want you to see. The image is a fake. She says she feels like an imposter and doesn't deserve what she has and her way of dealing with it is to buy more and do more of the things she feels she doesn't deserve-homes, vacations, cushy jobs she is not qualified for but gets based on privilege. She has a very strange way of dealing with it. All I know is it's not normal.

Anonymous said...

Boy I tell you what. If Emma is arranging her pap snaps she needs to do it more often because clearly we go un poco crazy around here without regular updates.

(FWIW, almost all celebrities arrange photo opportunities but this almost certainly isn't one.)

But seriously. Girl needs like a monthly check-in of some sort or people are gonna go loopy and decide she's in the QAnon conspiracy or something. Eatin' them babies in a pizza shop basement.

Girl went out for coffee. Chillax people.

Anonymous said...

Who are Chad and George?? I'm lost... lol

Anonymous said...

Damn quarantine really made some of y'all conspiracy theorists huh?. Like many anons above me have said. None of us personally know Emma. It's nit our place to say she's "fake" or if she's changed or not. Because we don't actually know her personally, what you think of her is your own opinion. Some may think she's a literal piece of shit and others may see her as a saint. However at the end of the day nobody except those who actually know her can say which one is more like the truth. Like even Eden has said some of y'all think literally everything Emma does is staged. I wouldn't be surprised if a picture of her comes out walking to a car, without somebody going on and on about carbon footprints (as if most of us don't use a car as a mode of transportation) or that she's somehow promoting something. Seriously let the girl go get a drink with her boyfriend and walk around the park. Without having a 100+ comment argument with other people just because y'all don't have the same opinion about a stranger.

* Side note:If y'all really like Emma that much then respect her wishes to keep somethings private. The girl has BEEN saying that she hates when people look into her loved one's private life.Leo's not a celebrity for y'all to be looking into his private life like that. It's fucking creepy to be looking for information about a stranger just because they're dating a celebrity.

Anonymous said...

The pap pics aren't private and nobody here is saying he/she knows her personally, people can judge a celebrity looking at interviews, photos, promo etc. because it's public, you can be a fan and point out things you don't like. The private life of Leo and her previous public boyfriends are spread out in Daily Mail articles talking about their families and jobs, also like i said before she doesn't stage the pap pics, Luke Windsor does whenever she needs damage control and this pics were taken a few days after the Tom Felton event with the HP cast. You can believe whatever you want

Anonymous said...

(FWIW, almost all celebrities arrange photo opportunities but this almost certainly isn't one.)

Lol yeah because Emma isn't like other girls (/s). And of course you must think her "What's in my bag" was genuine or her last DM photoshoot when she went to a shop after lockdown.

Emma has no news, no movies for people to talk about her. She needs to stay relevant and the sad reality is people read DM.

For the anon about Chad and George: it's her exbfs and she did with both of them embarrassing photoshoot for the DM.

Anonymous said...

You mean George Craig?? And Chad... I don't remember that guy.

Anonymous said...

yeh george craig

chord overstreet not chad my bad lol

Anonymous said...

Oh... haha that's ok, I imagined it could be about Chord but you never know... ;)
It seems this relationship with Leo is going very well and solid. Hope she finds happiness both in her personal and professional life. She has her finances solved for the rest of her life so I imagine, once you don't have to worry about that, life could feel kind of empy or meaningless without something exciting to take care of on a daily basics. People talk about "monthly vacations" a lot and that may look great from our point of view but I'm sure that kind of lifestyle is not as easy as it may seem to be, at least if you have a minimum of ambition as a person. Mental health is as important as everything else for your wellbeing.