Wednesday, January 6, 2021

New photo of Emma Watson for Vogue Italia (November 2015)



[Gallery] [Fashion] [Version française]





Follow this link for more photos from this photoshoot: Emma Watson Updates.

Thanks srkpc for the message :)




EDIT: There are too many comments on the article. Click on "Newest" as seen below for the latest ones.





If you have news to share (pictures, infos, scans...), please send an email to eden@emmawatson-updates.com Follow the blog:

876 comments:

1 – 200 of 876   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

even whiter privilege?

;D

Anonymous said...

I just don't know, kids these days.
A perfectly good chair and she sits on a dirty floor in her pristine white dress, just so she can attract a few foot fetishers.
Well you can jolly well wash that dress yourself young lady.
That should teach you a lesson.

El Roberto said...

@anon: :-))

(hope you know in such situations the general opinion is to see things differently, nowadays a lot of things (in my opinion: far too much) are considered to be 'art').

El Roberto said...

'whiter privilege'? it's completely different: she refuses to sit on the chair to keep it free for black people, of course ;-))

Anonymous said...

She is scared that the chair is less wooden than her acting........

:D

Anonymous said...

"She is scared that the chair is less wooden than her acting........"


Damn.... lmao

Anonymous said...

"She is scared that the chair is less wooden than her acting........"


Comment of the year right there. Time to shit the comments down Eden. See ya'll in 2022.

Anonymous said...

I think there are a couple of new pictures from the "out for a coffee" day with her boyfriend. At least I think I haven't seen them in the blog's post. Oh, and to the anon visiting regularly a blog about an actress they don'd like, enjoy your sad life!! ;)

Anonymous said...

"Oh, and to the anon visiting regularly a blog about an actress they don'd like, enjoy your sad life!! ;)"



I do like Emma but she has been a colossally disappointment in recent years. Oh and my life is great as I get to laugh at the stans all day. :)

Anonymous said...

Where are those new pics to find?

Anonymous said...

"Oh and my life is great as I get to laugh at the stans all day. :)"

That's literally the definition of a sad life... lol

"Where are those new pics to find?"

I've randomly saw them on Instagram, but I couldn't tell you how to find them. There were just 1 or 2 "new" ones anyway.

Anonymous said...

To the last Anon: just found them (https://www.instagram.com/p/CJlg3xJA3ol/). No idea why some people don't wanna share...

Anonymous said...

"No idea why some people don't wanna share..."

Sorry if I didn't explain myself correctly. What I meant is that I genuinely didn't know how to find them again as I've kinda stumbled upon them casually and didn't pay attention to the account who had posted them.

dabo said...

"Oh, and to the anon visiting regularly a blog about an actress they don'd like, enjoy your sad life!! ;)"

Is it a requirement that I have to like her acting?

I love her but I'm not gonna fool myself, her acting is not good, especially in her latest movies. And I think that's one of the reasons she stepped aside. But that's just my opinion, of course.

But do you think that she is satisfied with her own work? For real...

Anonymous said...

"But do you think that she is satisfied with her own work? For real..."

How would I know?? I don't know her so I can't tell you how she feels about anything. None of us can. And no, obviously it is not a requirement to like her acting but coming to the blog just to make an out of topic, agressive comment, is sad. People should look for something healthier and more productive to fill the emptiness in their lives.

Anonymous said...

"That's literally the definition of a sad life... lol"


( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°( ͡❛ ͜ʖ ͡❛) ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Anonymous said...

"She is scared that the chair is less wooden than her acting........"

Baaahhhhaaa!!!

Fp said...

Beautiful photo, thanks for sharing.

Anonymous said...

Love this photo of Emma (gorgeous dress!)! Thanks for sharing it! :-)

Anonymous said...

Be prepared, big news are coming...

Anon said...

What?

Anonymous said...

Obviously he/she is another hater waiting for somenoe to ask and then make one of them "clever" jokes...

Anon said...

Like she and her bf getting engaged? Lol, you’re right. The press has always done that with her boyfriends, well, at least three of them. I haven’t seen anything, so it’s just someone commenting something dumb.

Anonymous said...

To the Anon that posted his/her comment at 4:12 PM: if y0u know something more than us, please tell it!
Maybe I'm naive, but I really think not all the people writing such lines have bad intentions and they might know more than us (and myself included for sure).

Anon said...

Well whatever the news may be whether it’s regarding her personal life, kerig, or a new movie role, unless that person is close to Emma (like a rep or something), I highly doubt they’d go on a fan site and admit something big is coming up, especially if it’s regarding her private life. It’s just someone who wrote something to contribute to the blog. I’m not betting on it being an actual thing. People write the most insane things on here (me included, ngl)

Anonymous said...

She is becoming a mod for this site.

El Roberto said...

The Queen announced after her death Emma will be Queen.

;D

(omg, so inexecutable, even myself can't believe it :-)) )

Anonymous said...

Just stay positive, this is the year.

El Roberto said...

for a better imagination:

The Queen with a weird and a bit evil grin:
"I proudly want to announce that after my death, Emma Watson will be Queen!"
Whole audience:
"Wtf??"
Prince Charles with his little amount of grey hair:
"Nooooooo, I have been waiting for all of my life!!! :-("

Meghan to the press:
"I do not care and it has never bothered me."

would be a funny and bizarre situation :-D

Anon said...

That the queen dies?! That we get more Emma news? That everything does a 180 after all the crap we’ve been through in 2020?

El Roberto said...

The Queen going on:
"But, please, the throne seat has got to be transformed to metal, because I fear Emma wouldn't trust a wooden seat!“

:D :D

Anonymous said...

Shit, it's impossible to try to find any news about Emma on Twitter... It's so full of creeps!! You may need a session with a therapist after that.

Anonymous said...

She is more likely to get engaged than have another proper movie role at this point.

Anon said...

Is she?! Is that what the anon above was trying to say? If so, than why fake-Jesus of all people?

Anonymous said...

She won't be an actress anymore and will focus on her new career and family. I think she should be getting married soon. I wouldn't be surprised if she got pregnant.

Anon said...

I understand her possibly leaving Hollywood, but I don’t think she’s wanting to settle down quite yet. She still has that kerig position and may be wanting to some feminism stuff in the near future. And besides, she just coined the phrase “self-partner”; I don’t know if that was a PR thing, but it would seem odd to get married so soon after declaring yourself “self-partnered”. And pregnancy? Now you’re really talking.

Anonymous said...

"I understand her possibly leaving Hollywood"


I think it's the other way around. Especially in lead roles.

Fp said...

I mostly support Emma because of her work as an activist. I mean, I love her movies but I would have followed her the same even if she would "only" be an activist. I secretly hope that soon they will tell us that she is going to be part of the 8th march WOW foundation live event in London (I am currently in London) or, better than nothing, also on streaming. Anyway hope for some great news soon!

Anonymous said...

'work' as an activist?

a few speeches, pr tweets, hiding books?

i'd rather her do acting to be honest?? :/

Fp said...

'work' as an activist?
:)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Watson#Activism_and_advocacy

Anonymous said...

Sorry is that supposed to be impressive? Something her team wrote?

Oh and this so called 'WOW foundation live event in London' is just the usual tax dodging rich folk telling us plebs how to live our 'on the bread line' life's. Just like the G8's and the climate change stuff.

When you will wake up and realize the media is just lecturing and tell us how to think? All the while the elites laugh at us??

Emma is one of many celebs who play the game to gain publicity and credit.

Oh to be rich and privileged.

Fp said...

"When you will wake up and realize the media is just lecturing and tell us how to think? All the while the elites laugh at us??"

Absolutely not.
You have to remain curious, be open minded. People are not there to tell you what to do or what to believe. Sometimes media try to do it, but each of us can listen to others, live experiences, and then decide for ourselves.
Take care!

Anonymous said...

FP: Thanks for your comments!

When reading the comment sections (generally speaking, not only this website) it always amazes me how many people seem to assume only the worst of their fellow human beings (in this case Emma and other members of the "elite").

Anonymous said...

"Oh to be rich and privileged"



Yep. I don't know why others bother to follow her anymore. Following someone for their 'activism' is just obsession pure and simple.

El Roberto said...

@last anon:

I don't think that's a good point.
If you've got someone you like, and even if you see him/her twice a year, you try to support him/her. so let people support Emma if they want and don't be 'mean' to them!

Anonymous said...

If you've got someone you like, and even if you see him/her twice a year, you try to support him/her. so let people support Emma if they want and don't be 'mean' to them!



@El Roberto

Your right. Though to be honest I see Emma quite a lot as I wait outside her houses.

Anonymous said...

Emma is a great person and that's the reason why she was "expelled" from the Hollywood scene. Change my mind...

Anonymous said...

Yeah her wikipedia does sound weirdly PR-now, esp. when it calls The Circle a success, which it was not.
And I agree that I don't think it was her choice to leave Hollywood—she's the weakest of her contemporaries acting-wise, she probably wasn't getting parts.

Anonymous said...

There are rumors that it was her own choice to leave Hollywood, she only accepted Little Women as a favor to producer Amy Pascal.

Anonymous said...

Heard she took up a role in Raunchywood

Anonymous said...

We'll never find out whose decision it was. Even if it was totally up to her, it was much easier since she wasn't very active before. Or maybe she has realized there is a huge gap between her acting skills and her other peers (some of them invested in their professional career a lot including formal education in the acting schools).
But I'm really willing to believe she left Hollywood on her own terms. She earned a lot from the HP franchise and now she doesn't have to work at all.
There are rumors she tends to behave like a diva. It might be true: she might have wanted to be a very successful, great actress or nothing. Well, with lack of her acting skills retirement (2nd scenario) seems to be the only option here.
But if she really doesn't wanna pursue her career, why she's been living (before the pandemic outbreak at least) nearby: Venice, CA? Only for the nice mild climate?...

Anonymous said...

"But if she really doesn't wanna pursue her career, why she's been living (before the pandemic outbreak at least) nearby: Venice, CA? Only for the nice mild climate?..."

Well obviously her life long ambition was to meet a marijuana producing American hippy and.....VOILA.

Anonymous said...

"Heard she took up a role in Raunchywood"



Ah....I'm glad I'm not only one to see the recent leak ;)

Anonymous said...

http://www.imagebam.com/image/ac7aa01366639512

Anonymous said...

"I think she should be getting married soon. I wouldn't be surprised if she got pregnant. "

Yup Spanish Emma stans say she got engaged on a boat while there in February last year . Baby might be next few years.

Eden said...

"Yup Spanish Emma stans say she got engaged on a boat while there in February last year ."

Spain's "April's fool" is on December 28 so I wouldn't be surprised if that's when the "rumour" started.

Anonymous said...

Haha! Good point, Eden! :-D

Anonymous said...

A little bird told me Emma and Leo are over.

El Roberto said...

"a little bird told me" :-D (that's a nice one (joke)) :D :))

Eden said...

A bigger bird told they have three children and named their first one Eden. I win.

El Roberto said...

Wow. Eden. I take a bow. :-)

(time's been too short for 3, but one, who knows)

Anonymous said...

"A bigger bird told they have three children and named their first one Eden."

http://www.imagebam.com/image/7ac8591366835897

Anonymous said...

"A bigger bird told they have three children and named their first one Edam. I win.



Nah birdy is lying. Emma is lactose intolerant.

El Roberto said...

"... is lactose intolerant.."

...that's why a big hawk told me she called the first one Adam.

;D

Anonymous said...

If she ever gets pregnant/engaged, we might not learn it for a long time.
Even US based Emma Stone was able to hide her pregnancy from press for several months.
And Emma W. is in my opinion not that chased & pestered by paps as other Hollywood celebrities/startles.
She's extremely private and able to maintain low profile for months.
The best example would be no news about her for the last few years (!). Some of her fan pages (this one included) are drying out of the lack of any updates.
Really curious what's going to happen to her in the next/further future.

Anon said...

Same thing happens with her breakups too. Remember her and Knight? They were last seen together in May of 2017 and then we hadn’t learned that they broke up until November of the same year.
Also, I think people can stop bringing up pregnancy. That certainly may not happen for a while. She may be progressive, but I think she’s really conservative and is very careful when it comes to intimacy. I certainly do not see her getting pregnant before marriage.

Anonymous said...

I can imagine her having a child in a partnership not waiting for getting married.
But I agree with you on that she's 'quite' conservative.
I think she's more conservative than she admitted it (in numerous interviews) publicly. It seems to me she'd like to be considered as modern, liberated, free mind woman whom doesn't matter all social expectations.
She called 'a spiel' (as she thought about it in the past) being single, but then we could remember her having boyfriend almost all the time, moreover: short after the Vogue interview she got in touch with Leo (maybe she was even in relationship with him giving the interview?...).
It seems to me she doesn't want or she's not able/willing to admit she cannot be alone. I don't know why she started talking about being a "self-partnered" inventing new term and making so much fuzz about it?...
There are so many young people who're following her.
If they catch this inconsistency, ambiguity and even hypocrisy, they might think being a single isn't that nice & great...

Eden said...

"inventing new term and making so much fuzz about it"

How can you consider her responsible about the fuzz around it when all she did was use that expression once in an interview. The media are the ones who made headlines about it, not her. Also, we literally know close to nothing about her love life. It looks to us like she has a new boyfriend weeks after the previous one but the truth is we have no idea when the break-up happens. We just see her with a guy and assume she's still with him until she's pictured with someone else. It's not because she might enjoy dating that it means "she cannot be alone".

Anonymous said...

Maybe I wasn't enough clear in my last line.
It should have sounded: and causing so much fuzz about it (not her 'fault' though, agree).
As you said and I in my previous posts as well: we do know nothing not about her love life, so about her private life at all.
That's why all written by me above are purse assumptions, guessing.

Anonymous said...

"But I agree with you on that she's 'quite' conservative."


She is as conservative as it comes. She is just playing the hollywood/media game.

Anonymous said...

From Ruperts latest Interview

"It's also, like, super weird for me to think that we are all at the age where we are having children but we definitely are."

It wouldn't surprise me if Emma has just disappeared from social media and stuff as she is planning to settle down soon and have kids like Rupert suggests. She is at an age where women start thinking about that kind of thing and when she sees her peers starting families it could be on her mind also.

Anon said...

Maybe, but her break could also be due to the backlash she received in the summer. Social media can turn into a VERY toxic environment, especially for celebrities. It was probably taking a toll on her mental health, and just needed a break from it completely. She’s also not done working doing Kering and the London Project she and a few other women are working on for female empowerment.
Just last year, she has said in an interview that she felt “pressured” to be married or have a kid by her age, but also admitted that she was over that thought and was very happy with where she is and what she’s doing without all those things. There are many HP stars who are a couple years younger, the same age or older than her and they don’t have kids or are married.

Anonymous said...

I don’t know why people are sometimes down on Emma’s acting career, it might not be plentiful but what it has produced has generally been very successful. She’s usually called out as the most successful potter actor by the media (from the young cast of course). Unfortunately for others like Rupert and Matt, their recent interviews articles etc even mention it (which can’t be easy).

Anonymous said...

Example the recent New York Times interview with Matt calling her and Pattinson bonefide movie stars.

Anonymous said...

At the mention of Ruperts interviews, if Emma made the comments he did about walking away from acting (again - he’s made them before) everyone on here and in the media would lose their minds. It’d be absolutely everywhere...
Rupert's recent interviews don’t seem to gain a huge amount of traction unless there’s some new potter tidbit

Anonymous said...

Robert Pattinson has the best career of the young cast, followed by Daniel because he works almost all the time. A movie star doesn't spend years without doing any acting project and before someone brings up BATB that movie was the live-action adaptation of one of the most beloved animated Disney classics. Aladdin also made 1 billion at the box office but the lead actors aren't movie stars at all. High profile =//= best career

Anonymous said...

I wouldn’t rate Dan’s career at all, often does not mean good, he’s been in loads of really sub par stuff for him. Just as a general point loads of movie stars don’t work for long periods of time and Aladdin was sold and driven as a Will Smith movie, the exact same way Disney drove Beauty as Emma. Will Smith is undoubtedly a movie star.

Anonymous said...

Matt didn't call them that, the journalist did

Anonymous said...

Which I believe was the OPs point, that it must be a tad irritating for Matt/Rupert for journalists to (a) point to Robert and Emma’s careers in articles and interviews and (b) bring them (and Potter) up all the time in write up all the time.
I think Emma being an actress is debatable but movie star I’d say she is.

Anonymous said...

And that a very wide ranging amount of the media consider Emma a movie star/successful. It seems to just be fans that don’t.

Anonymous said...

The comment means the interview was with Matt, and it was calling her a movie star, not that Matt called her one. The interview is the subject of the sentence.

Anonymous said...

Calling her a movie star—after Regression, Colonia, and The Circle all bombed—is a stretch. Agree that BatB would've done well no matter what, because it's disney, and everyone said she was the weakest link in Little Women. Also plenty of rumours that the studios find her too difficult to work with and won't hire her. She may have name recognition, but is not a respected actor (as much as I hoped for it for a long time, she just doesn't have the acting chops of her contemporaries. Jennifer Lawrence, Emma Stone, Florence Pugh, and Saoirse Ronan can all act circles around her)

Anonymous said...

The other points are fine but there are no credible rumours that studios find her difficult to work with, it’s that one that she was being awkward on a set and her vegan diet was demanding when she wasn’t on a set or even vegan. Several studios have worked with her or tried to hire her more than times, as have directors. Those are like the rumours that the potter cast didn’t like her or Daniel Bruhl didn’t like her, we now know other than Tom she’s in touch with the most people out of the young cast. Or David Yates found her awkward and then tried to hire her for Your Voice in My head. I know are bored but there’s no need to make up nonsense.

Anonymous said...

Yeah right, so Dan's projects aren't good (when he also does theatre and tv getting good reviews) but BATB was a huge hit because Emma is a box office draw LOL

Anonymous said...

Emma and Leo on vacation in Mexico? I'm not sure, but I saw Leo's friend post an IG stories about him.

Anonymous said...

Leo's parents have a vacation home in Mexico and he is probably with family. If Emma is there, she had to somehow get out before quarantine.

Anonymous said...

I also doubt Emma would allow an IG story to be posted if they are there together, given how she tries to keep her privacy and keep the paparazzi and fans away.

Anon said...

If she is in Mexico, so much for the “I stay home for my mom, grandma, and healthcare worker friend” post she did back when quarantine began. Honestly, given the amount of traveling she’s done, I thought she would be a bit more careful in a pandemic, but I guess spending time with her bf is more important than keeping her loved ones (who are old, on the frontline and has a compromised immune system) safe.

Anon said...

“But I saw Leo’s friend posted on his story about him” dang, you know his friends, IGs? A bit intrusive, don’t you think?

Anonymous said...

That I stay home was March. I wouldn’t be surprised if They went to Mexico, Emma can get in there (as opposed to US) and he hadn’t seen his family since March. They could go and quarantine there. His fam have gone very quiet on IG recently. Their couples account has been extremely quiet for yonks (and it’s follows have dropped by a few) but so has her personal IG but it been way quieter since her public account went dormant, she seemed to step away from all of it pretty much around the same time so I think it’s genuinely just a social media break. Some of her friends have actually come off IG. I’d think if they broke up they’d delete it and people on both sides are still following it.

Anonymous said...

I swear to God if she got out of England to quarantine in another tropical paradise, I am done with her. Damn rich hypocrites. Her and her glorified pot dealer claim to be progressive liberals and go out and live like rich conservatives fitting right in with all the people that cause the problems in the world. To hell with them.

Anon said...

But what does it mean when they lose followers? And I find it odd how their following and follower numbers are not close to the same. They’re following about triple the amount of their followers numbers. I wonder who/what else they’re following given that that account is a celebrity’s private account. The follower number fluctuates too, which is weird, but yeah, they haven’t posted in months, which is weird. They may or may not be together in Mexico because it’s a bit careless of them to be posting Leo when everyone knows who he is at this point. He just may be with his family and she may still be in London. I’m honestly surprised at how long this relationship is lasting. Soon it will be her longest relationship behind Will. I don’t know how much longer it’ll last, though. In every picture we’ve seen, she’s seemed to be very down.

Anon said...

If they were vaccinated, it would be a whole different story, but I doubt they are. As smart as she is, or I thought she was, she’s not taking this pandemic as serious as it needs to be. She’d rather spend time with her weed dealer, man bun wearing boyfriend than staying inside and keeping herself and others safe. Spending quality time with Leo is not worth getting covid for.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
That I stay home was March. I wouldn’t be surprised if They went to Mexico, Emma can get in there (as opposed to US) and he hadn’t seen his family since March.

How do you know he hasn't seen his family since March? He left England in June for Ibiza and was not with Emma in Italy in August and was in Ibiza again in September. You could travel to the USA after June. Did he really not go see his family at some point? Nice guy if he didn't...

Anonymous said...

Eden should prob delete that

Anonymous said...

Does Eden not moderate these anymore?

Anonymous said...

UK is in a very bad place with covid at the moment with a new faster spreading strain of virus and they have a 'travel corridor ban' seems like a hardcore lockdown again so not sure Emma would have been able to leave this time tbh

Anonymous said...

All UK airports open with flights in and out from most counties. Uk isn’t like Aus or NZ where they actually shut the borders, you’re able to come and go from UK from most countries as long as you follow quarantine rules and since Monday have a negative covid test before arriving (yes it only came in Monday). I know this as I’ve travelled a few times for work. So long as you’re responsible and follow rules I don’t see problem with it.

Anonymous said...

To an anon above, I don’t think Dan’s projects are much good either, the last number that I’ve seen ended up getting slated. Quantity doesn’t equality quality I think he should’ve far more discerning, I haven’t seen him in anything good in ages.

Anonymous said...

My understanding is that as of the 18th all unnecessary travel was banned including vacations. She might have seen it coming and gotten out before then. Like others have said, I seriously doubt she would let one of Leo's friends post something if they were together. They probably broke up. She always breaks up in November and it is always announced in January. Sarcasm.

Anonymous said...

What have you seen of him? Because Swiss Army Man,Jungle, Escape from Pretoria and Miracle Workers are pretty good, he has a few bad movies but every actor has them except A-listers like Leonardo DiCaprio or Christian Bale

Anonymous said...

I saw Dan in a dumb action movie called Guns Akimbo recently it was straight from the 90s with how dated it felt lol but it was kinda fun and over the top didn't know he could do action stuff like that it's pretty much a b-movie...I heard the director got canceled because he turned out to be pretty nasty on twitter so maybe Dan Regrets working with that guy.

Anonymous said...

If they genuinely wanted to ban travel they’ve have shut the borders like other countries. Guns akimbo was so terrible it was almost enjoyable, almost. Jungle was very mediocre. He seems to constantly get mediocre films... beast of burden, imperium, the f word, Frankenstein, Now you See me. Boy needs a new agent. The theatre quality has also dropped a bit since Cripple of Inishman.

Anonymous said...

To be fair, Rupert has done far worse than Dan film wise, far far worse...

Anonymous said...

If we’re doing a competition, I think worst post potter film goes to Tom felton for the Apparition, it might be one of the worst films ever made.

Anonymous said...

Wow seriously? If you don't like one single project he does maybe he doesn't have a problem....hating doesn't makes you more objetive

Anonymous said...

I saw on IMDbPro that Dan has been away from UTA for a while, he is only signed to UK talent agency but he has been working in the US most of the time which is an awkward situation. I think maybe no reputable US talent agency wants him and it would be hard for him to get good film projects. He could have made a lot of mediocre films if his vision was limited to B-movies.

Anonymous said...

That’s very knee jerk. You’ll clearly note I did not list “everything” he’s been in, just the mediocre stuff which is unfortunately a lot especially recently. The woman in black and Kill your darlings were both very good. Horns was weird but brave. His theatre work including and pre cripple of inishman (as I clearly alluded to) was also extremely good though what has followed hasn’t been as good. This isn’t hating, I understand that he’s trying to be different and a bit quirky but I think he needs better advice around him as he’s hitting duds far too often especially in the last few years.

Anonymous said...

Ok but just because you find them mediocre doesn't make them duds, Imperium has very decent reviews and his plays usually get praise along with his performances. His projects aren't masterpieces but many times they are good enough, Daniel doesn't chase Oscar-worthy roles and usually male actors don't get really good projects until they're in their 40's unless they're Oscar nominated/winners before or they're very lucky. All the really good scripts right now go to the male A-listers/ Oscar favorites but maybe one day he will get a major role again. It's a very competitive industry

Anonymous said...

I would have thought Dan just enjoys being an actor and takes on projects that appeal to him, irrespective of their 'worthiness', whereas Emma tested the indie waters with Colonia/Regression (and her fun This is the end cameo), but then stepped back into the mainstream.

For me Emma's best performance was 'Perks'.
It was the one role she seemed to 'inhabit', whereas the rest were roles she acted, with varying degrees of success.
Dan may have had less success after HP, but, of the admittedly few films I've seen of his, he appears the better actor and embraces acting as a fun and rewarding career, which may not necessarily be something you could say of Emma.


Anonymous said...

People overlook that Emma’s performances usually get praised, she rarely gets actually negative reviews but people here seem much harsher on her than Dan. I’d agree with anon about an awful lot of Dan’s movies being average or subpar. Saying he’s experimenting and having fun is fine, or that actors don’t get great scripts etc. or it’s hard for a male under 40 (which wouldn’t be anything as difficult as being an actress who rarely get good scripts in any event and are in a extremely saturated market under 40, far more parts are written for males of any age), but he’s still not done great quality wise. He’s much better on stage and personally I think his acting works far better on stage than on screen having seen him several times. Personal taste but I’d much prefer to watch Emma on a screen and Dan on a stage.

Anonymous said...



Eden.

Can you remove some if not all of the recent 'chat room' like posts.

Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Why would any of this convo need taken down? people aren't fighting or attacking each other? So some people don't like Dan's movies all that much what is wrong with that?

Anonymous said...

"Can you remove some if not all of the recent 'chat room' like posts."


Have to agree. Sorry but his isn't a chat room about anyone other than Emma really. :/

Anonymous said...

Don't start complaining about the comments section, we are fine this way. If you don't like it you can just skip it or go somewhere else.

Anonymous said...

Some people get angry when they see comments that don't like Dan's movies or underestimate him. Why so sensitive? I think that's the end of talking about his career here.That's enough.

Anonymous said...

As long as there is no name-calling rudeness or being cruel and comments are on topic of Emma her movies, hp related stuff including her co-stars as its all related, I dont see why anything needs to be removed.

Anonymous said...

Dan has far more range than Emma, its not even a contest.

Anonymous said...

I was only replying to the anon who thinks that his lastest projects are duds because he/she finds mediocre, of course you prefer Emma that's why you're here also young actresses get great roles if they're talented. You just have to look at the careers of Jlaw, Margot Robbie, Emma Stone, Saoirse Ronan etc.

Dj Anubis said...

I dont think any of the posts need to be deleted or taken down. Nothing has been out of line nor has anyone attacked each other. Furthermore, if someone is going to bring up articles in which former Potter actors/actresses make reference to Emma to me that opens up the discussion about those other actors/actresses, etc. Its the natural flow of discussion when you do that. Its not right to try and force deletions just because you dont like where the conversation is going. IMO

Anonymous said...

Of course talented and excellent actors will have a better career, and opportunity is also very important. Emma and Dan are both untalented actors whose careers have benefited from opportunity. Now, Emma almost quit acting, Dan loves acting very much, no matter whether his movies are good or mediocre, you can say he got some good reviews, I know he works hard, but he doesn't have the talent, it's hard for him to break through after HP.

Anonymous said...

Wow, some people are really thin skinned about Dan. People were making pretty valid points about his movie career.

Anonymous said...

I think Dan’s height has perhaps held him back with mainstream studio stuff, other than that he’s young, male and white i.e. who the vast vast majority of decent Hollywood speaking parts are written for. If he’s unhappy with the scripts he’s getting he could try what a lot of major actresses have resorted to to get decent speaking parts and set up his own production company.

Eden said...

I understand that some people have no interest whatsoever in the discussion going on right now, but I won't delete the comments. To be honest, I much prefer this discussion about Emma and (mostly) Dan's acting capabilities over one about Emma's boyfriends or love life XD

Anonymous said...

I agree, as lots of people have said it was a natural progression of posts, not like Eden posted an emma article and the first comment was one about Dan and slagging him off. Stuff shouldn’t be deleted just because one or two people get overly sensitive about Dan. “That’s enough” should only be called when people have overstepped a line not just because someone doesn’t like the conversation. It’s clearly interested a few people. And it’s a lot more normal than people stalking Leo’s friends IGs.

Anonymous said...

Saying that he needs a new agent because his projects are now "duds" (based on personal opinions, not facts) isn't a valid point, it's mean criticism

Anonymous said...

We can't really start deleting comments or the blog will stop being active no one will see edens ads and the site won't get paid for :/ Also since Emma is looking semi-retired these little conversations are whats keeping the fandom going atm tbh

Eden said...

"no one will see edens ads"

XD That genuinely made me laugh, thank you. They're right though, THINK ABOUT THE ADS, PEOPLE! (Just kidding, please don't think about it)

Anonymous said...

don't do dan do emma pls

Anonymous said...

I've just seen several Emma's photos taken at the time when HP franchise was at its paramount.
Those photos I'm referring to have been shot for photo calls purposes (online, printed press...etc.); staged photo calls.
I got heavily struck how much those photos are sexist; I'm shocked. It was only few years ago; and the world since then has enormously changed (for good in this case). I cannot even imagine such photo calls are organized nowadays.
Her poses on the pics... Just perfect, ideal pictures for ephebophiles. The photographers can be blamed for them. But shocking is that the parents (not only hers, but of all the teens who participated in such photo sessions) accepted their kids are presented this way.

Anonymous said...

emma should do a housewife photoshoot for good practice

Anonymous said...

"emma should do a housewife photoshoot for good practice"



yeh. just suspenders and yellow washing up gloves. mmmmmm.



(update)

*sorry wrong site.

Anonymous said...

"emma should do a housewife photoshoot for good practice"

yeh. just suspenders and yellow washing up gloves. mmmmmm.
(update)

*sorry wrong site.

Haha.

PS Believe it or not a Brit soapie star (Gemma Atkinson) did do a rubber gloves and undies PS for a magazine. I've always considered said PS to be an ode to Kenny Everett(or maybe not).


http://www.imagebam.com/image/b16f3d1367530518

NOOOoooooo

Anonymous said...

She didn't have any nudes leaked. They were pictures of her in swimsuits and some modest lingerie from a private clothes fitting she did. Some idiots have photoshopped them and some idiot even dressed up a model nude in a bathtub and got the same jewelry Emma wears and photoshopped birthmarks in a nude video claiming it to be Emma. The problem is that the dumbasses showed too much of the models face and the face shape and lips and ears were not even close to Emma. I think the video has since been removed.

Anonymous said...

People forget onlyfans isn't just about nudes, people sell artwork and post other content for their fans. many celebs have it without posting nudes if Emma joined it's probably something like that im sure its a fake account anyway.

Anonymous said...

There are no nude leaks of Emma just clothes fitting as other anon said. The only nude of Emma is a pap shot of her sunbathing in Italy that was sold to a French magazine last year it was spammed on Twitter for ages till people thankfully reported the image and removed it. Things like that are why I hate paps so creepy to do this to her.

Anonymous said...

The picture in Italy is fake, as well. You can tell from how grainy the photo is and the bad Photoshop job on her face. That, and no offense to Emma as I am in the same boat, but she has small breasts. With the swimsuit off, they magically became larger and perfect shaped. That was a bad Photoshop job and as private and worried as she is about stuff like that, she would never go topless in plain sight on a public beach.

Anonymous said...

Not only that, but in that picture from Italy, Emma is looking right at the person taking the topless photo and is smiling and has her phone out like she is taking a picture of the person taking a picture of her. It is so fake.

Anonymous said...

Haha. I had forgotten about that photo. Her head was too small for the body and the upper body and lower body didn't match and they forgot some of the rings she was wearing. I feel bad for Emma that they do that kind of stuff. It's just evil.

Anonymous said...

All that and it was literally only one photo. If Emma Watson was really topless, the asshole paparazzi would have taken a million photos. It is so fake and so wrong. Sometimes I am glad that I'm not a celebrity.

El Roberto said...

"That, and no offense to Emma as I am in the same boat,but Emma has..."
=> as this sounded good-heartedly, I wanted to leave a <3 here

Anonymous said...

Well, they certainly were not the same breasts as her Vanity Fair photoshoot. I'm not sure which Photoshop job is worse. I know as women we have slightly different size breasts on each side, but in that Vanity Fair shot, she had a gravity defying right breast that looked twice the size of the left one and neither had a natural shape at all. She had them photoshop that shoot like crazy. She said in an interview when asked about criticism from Feminists about that shoot that she doesn't know what her tits have to do with it. Neither do I because I'm pretty sure none of these are her tits. Yet, here we are talking about them. I just wish the paparazzi would leave her be.

Anonymous said...

I thought that the funniest thing about that fake Italy photo is that she was topless in the shade. In all the other photos she was sunbathing with her top on in the sunlight, then she decides to go toplesss and moves to a shady, more crowded area!? Yeah right. Whoever did that photo was clueless, but they got some magazine to buy and publish it.

Anonymous said...

sorry deluded stans but at the very least some of the nudes are real.

give it up......

emma is not going to sleep with you

x

Anonymous said...

'at the very least some of the nudes are real.'

now that's a delusion

Anonymous said...

Ok. I will admit that I had never heard of the Italy photo and wanted to see what people were talking about with the Photoshop. Sadly, you can still find it. It is terrible. I could probably do a better Photoshop job. She has a fat belly that almost looks a few months pregnant and has a flat tummy in all the real photos. I hope she sues the hell out of all these people.

Anonymous said...

If Italy shot is fake how did they get another woman wearing same bikini bottoms holding the same phone Emma owns in the same resort? you can't fake a photo that doesn't have a source image and there are no pics of another woman who could have emmas face photoshoped onto it from that resort that was used as the source to fake...I think its real I'm afarid and low quality because of how far away the pap was likely hiding in a tree by the road side of the resort :(

Public.Fr the french mag who bought it have hunted down other celebs like this such as Sophie turner and she sued them but under french law they did nothing wrong as she was in public which is very messed up. I think Emma did nothing against the mag as it only brings attention and it would only confirm it as real, the scummy paps finally got away with it

Anonymous said...

To the last Anon: I saw the pic. It's photoshopped like hell.
Very poor quality and it supposed to be taken not from a huge distance, but rather close up.
Emma is looking straight into the lens and her head is not to the size of her body. As someone else has already mentioned it: her belly on the pic is big (or better said: fatty) and in reality she's a really flat tummy. It's sooo fake that no one should be fooled but it seems a lot of people have been taken in. Unbelievable!

El Roberto said...

It might be difficult to be sure whether everyone is talking about the same foto :D
But this intense discussion led me to have a look...

The photo I've seen (never seen before), I'd say it's her. And it's not a fat belly!, it's a 'normal woman belly'. And it's 'normal woman breasts'.
If you make the same posture your bellies might look like the same.
I'm a bit astonished what you expect her belly and breasts to look like? ×???×

El Roberto said...

"give it up. emma is not going to sleep with you

x"

You leave "a punch in the face" (for some) and a kiss. This really is a fascinating combination :D ×??×

Anonymous said...

For those of you that have seen that photo and think it is real, you need to get your eyes examined. It is terrible quality and obviously fake for all the other reasons mentioned. Photo shopping is easy these days and can even be done on a phone. You can transpose a face onto another body and someone else's bottom half easily. Maybe she tried to sue them, maybe she didn't. How do we know? Maybe she didn't bother because she figured no one would look at it and actually think it is real. Remember, it is one picture. Do you think if she was topless, only one pic would be taken? That, and she is smiling at the person taking the pic and taking her own pic of him. Does that sound like Emma? Don't be as naive as the gross people that buy magazines like that.

Anonymous said...

As the above said, this could easily be faked with the technology these days and this obviously was. You wouldn't even have to be there. You could get a random picture of that beach and a random picture of someone sunbathing(not even at that beach or topless) and transpose and remove and add things like Emma's head and swim bottom and legs from another picture. This was an incredibly amateur job, obviously rushed to cash in while the other pics of her in Italy were still gaining attention. Remember, these people buy and sell pics of celebrities hoping that they are as embarrassing and compromising as possible. They don't exactly have any ethics or care if they are real or not. It is all about the money.

Anonymous said...

Back to the clothes fitting photos that got photoshopped to have hard nipples and to be nude and all that. Someone even did a nude bathtub video that was fake, as someone else already mentioned that showed too much of the model's face that didn't match Emma's. They claimed the video was taken from the same phone. What people either don't know or have forgotten is that the photos were not stolen from Emma's phone, but from the stylists phone. When Emma sued, her argument was that because the stylist had sent the photos to Emma, they then became Emma's property and that is why they should be taken down. Do you really think that this stylist took nude photos of Emma or a nude bathtub video and had them on her phone or Emma would allow something like that? Some of you are too gullible.

Anon said...

Way off topic, but their couple account just lost pretty much all of their followers. What the hell does that mean?!

Anonymous said...

"Way off topic, but their couple account just lost pretty much all of their followers. What the hell does that mean?!"

They saw the outtake above and are pissed she didn't sit on the damn chair.

No other possible explanation.
Well other than they now have a Mr & Mrs R....... account.

Anon said...

Kudos to them for getting married in secret... lol

Anonymous said...

I saw it too, I think she deleted their followers, she hasn't updated for a long time, maybe she won't want to use it anymore, but she didn't delete posts. I'm not sure if that means a break up.

Anonymous said...

They can mean many things ... that they have ended or they moved on because there are many gossipers who have already found out about the couple's account, a few days ago I saw an article that reported on that I suppose they have received many friend requests, the Photos have not been deleted and Leo's relatives still follow Emma on the official instagram account.

Anon said...

The only relative that follows Emma on her official one is his sister, but I think she’s been following her for a while, even before they began dating. Daisy’s just a part of her fandom and agrees with a lot of what Emma does, and just by luck, she’s dating her brother. The article that reported of them dated said that Leo’s friends “were shocked to see him in the arms of the actress” or something like that.

Anon said...

We’re still in “lockdown” though and their families live on opposite ends of the world. Why would she all of a sudden delete everyone from their shared account when it’s been up for months. I think this further proves that the whole account was just because of the pandemic. With all the travelling she’s done, it sure seems like she thinks this is all over...

Anonymous said...

If their account was established only because of the pandemic situation , I don't get why they'd be about to delete it. The pandemic & global lockdown (with a lot of local lockdowns being still in force) is still (unfortunately) in full swing.
No one really knows what's happening to/with them. All are pure guessing.
What I still don't get is how some fans were able to find out their private IG account, moreover: how some of them could be accepted by the couple and be able to see the account's content. It's beyond my understanding & imagination.

Anonymous said...

This is a total guess on my part, but they probably broke up. They privately announced it to their friends and family who follow them and that is why the number of followers dropped on the private IG couple account. Emma is likely keeping the account open since enough people know about it that a complete deletion would leave no doubt of a break-up and Emma likes her privacy and for speculation from the press to be avoided. I hope that is not the case, but that is the only explanation I can think of for the sudden drop in followers.

Anonymous said...

His mum and sister still follow Emma but they likely did before all of this, his mum follows her book club. Emma’s friends have all stopped following their couple account, and given the timing that we’re still in a pandemic and that he seems to currently be with his family, I’d say the likelihood that they’ve broken up is extremely high. They could have moved accounts but my guess is a breakup. They stopped liking things with their couple account in December. She’s also now posted recently on her own Instagram for the first time.

Anonymous said...

Maybe the reason of dropping the number of the followers is the fact more & more outsiders found the account out and the couple has decided to establish a brand new one and this time to apply better security settings to it not allowing external people to find it out (?)

Anonymous said...

Unfortunately, I have to agree that a break-up is likely. If they moved accounts, they would just transfer everything to the new one and completely delete the old one. Why keep it open and all the loss of followers? I hope she is ok.

Anonymous said...

Maybe keeping the old one alive they'd like to fool their followers? Those that are not very welcoming.

Anonymous said...

To the Anon who's posted at 2:31 PM: I don't see any new post on her own IG...

Anonymous said...

You cannot gain access to the account unless they approve you as a follower. All people can see is the number of posts and number of followers/following. Besides, tons of people have known about it since way back in March of last year. They would have created a new one long ago if it was a matter of too many people finding out about it.

Anonymous said...

Replying to the line posted by an Anon at 2:42 PM: so maybe they did create another account (some time ago already) about which only their families/close circle of friends know (?)

Anonymous said...

There would have been no reason to create a new account. The account they have is already a private one that only friends and family can gain access to. It requires them approving you as a follower and someone posted several months ago that they constantly changed the password and you would have to have been given the password by them and enter it every time. Nobody can access the account other than those they wanted and if they wanted someone to stop following them, they would simply delete them as a follower. They have been using the account until recently and the only logical explanation for the loss of followers(including family) is a break-up.

Anonymous said...

I think people thinking they’ve created a completely new account this late in the day are clutching at straws (they’d have done it ages ago or when people initially found it with the pic of them) especially given the timing that he’s back on the other side of the water. It’s far more likely it’s a breakup, it went very inactive towards the end of last year it even stopped liking stuff. She’s posted twice in the last week on her own account and he’s liking stuff on his own account as well. That isn’t of itself definitive but given the following drop and that he’s out of the UK, and his friends are being way less careful putting stuff up about him, I’d say if we add all that together they broken up...

Anonymous said...

They don’t need to create a new account, I still don’t get how some people here are confusing fans being able to see the account with following the account. Nobody here is following the account, if you know the name you can see how many posts they have, and if you know who the family/friends and those people have open accounts or you follow them, you can see if they follow each other and likes/comments etc. no fans are following their account it’s secure. They may get a lot of follow requests but they’d just delete them as they’ve been doing or change the name as they have done previously (though if you had previously searched for an account the new name will come up). Unless someone has hacked the account, they have no reason to suddenly delete the followers now, and if the account was hacked it’s the posts that you’d generally delete. It’s a breakup

Anonymous said...

i see keira knightly has stolen a march on emma with her latest attention grabbing headline. i mean lol.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-55795237

Anonymous said...

Can someone finally tell me if we're referring to the same Emma's IG account? I thought she's only one (the official one; besides of the private account with Leo): one of the Anon said she's posted on her IG recently and the very last Anon said she's posted twice. However I'm still not able to see the new posts you're referring to... Hence my confusion.
Completely got all about their private IG account. However it's still unclear or even unbelievable for me: how some people know the details of it, e.g.: about changing the password (that you need to get from them to be able to keep watching them); it has to be someone who got accepted by them; so my guessing is that an insider is sharing some details. If you wouldn't have followed them you wouldn't have known all those details. Even people who found their account out can only see the number of posts and # of followers/following. But nothing else/more.
Their relationship is none of my business, I really don't care if they're still together or they broke up.
But I don't think only the fact he's in the US now can be a reliable "proof" of their separation. If he spent several last months in the UK, his parents apart, no wonder we'd like to see them.

Anonymous said...

His mum is one of the two still following the couple account, that’s about it. I don’t get why they’d delete it now and all of a sudden he’s also with his family. That to me reeks of a breakup.

Anonymous said...

It can be an amicable break-up. Emma has said that she is still friends with a lot of people that she has dated. She can still be friends with Leo and his family and share an interest in gardening or whatever with his family and keep in touch that way and occasionally share something on Instagram. They don't all have to hate each other because they might have broken up.

Anonymous said...

Nope she has:
1 an official account
2 her own private account which she’s had for years
3 the couple account
4 she also occasionally has other open accounts for pastimes etc.

Anonymous said...

To the last Anon: thanks for the clarification on all her accounts.
I wasn't aware she's has so many of them :-P

Anonymous said...

My two cents is also on breakup, probably amicable due to some of his family still following her (but pretty sure they did before the relationship anyway as people have said). She’s definitely posted less in the past 6 months, she took a social media break both publicly and privately, her private IG used to be super active, but it’s still been a like every once and a while (even if it’s him doing it). But still deleting followers now is weird unless they’re over.

Anonymous said...

It’s weird, surely a breakup would be deleting the account?

Anonymous said...

Enough people know the account exists that completely deleting it would make it obvious and Emma likes to be very private. We usually don't hear about her break-ups until months after the fact.

Anonymous said...

Emma has tried to keep other breakups secret for a while till her partner and her find someone else (i guess she worries about a load dudes hitting up her management trying to get dates lol) so I guess she would just keep the account there as she knows stans are watching it by now.

Anonymous said...

"His mum is one of the two still following the couple account"

You follow his mother's private account?

Anon said...

She used to be public but then went private sometime in November 2019. But I have to admit, it is kind of weird.

Anon said...

Both Matt and Mack were amicable breakups too, and I think she was/is still in touch with him. Idk about Mack, though.

Anonymous said...

So everyone is just going to ignore an alien abduction and them trying to cover their tracks?

Anon said...

Moving accounts is an unlikely thing because one, she would’ve probably moved the posts too, and two, people have known about the account since March hence why they changed their profile pic and username. Given that we don’t know until months after the fact that she’s broken up with her bf, she’s probably just trying to be private about it. This would be a different story if we were no longer in lockdown, but the world is still pretty bad, so the pandemic’s not over. If they were to move accounts and try to be even more private about it, she wouldn’t leave the posts of the old one because people can hack private accounts to see their posts. I’m seeing this as a breakup. Sorry to tell people.

Anonymous said...

If they break up, Leo will probably open his account, and so will his family. We don't know what happened, we'll see.

Anonymous said...

Leo has been using his own account again and Emma has used her own one twice again, recently.

Anonymous said...

Leo has two private accounts and he deleted all his photos a few months ago, but he keeps using it.

Anonymous said...

There was a rumour on twitter last year that Leo and Emma were having a discussion while having coffee about her moving to America with him full time but she wants to stay in UK as America is pretty crazy these last few years. It could be the source of any tension, leo might really miss being in the states or something.

Anonymous said...

She got a new job at Kering working from their London headquarters. I highly doubt there was any discussion of her moving to America with him. She would have to quit the job. Just another rumor like all the other ones about her getting married to every boyfriend...

Anonymous said...

She also already has a house in New York and one in California and could visit. If he was trying to get her to quit her new job and move to America, that would be incredibly selfish.

Anon said...

I kind of feel bad of the fact that she’s not able to just stay in one place. That alone must make relationships difficult. I think that’s just a one person rumor that someone made up. During their coffee date, it didn’t seem like that was what they talked about.

Anonymous said...

I saw the tweets about that it was from a waitress who served Emma a sausage roll and said she was very sweet right? haha I want to find that thread again now to double-check as she did mention they were talking about America and Trump losing and how it would be okay to go back there now

Anonymous said...

As an American, I find that amusing. Trump may have been a butthead, but it is not like America was some unsafe, dangerous hellhole and now Biden is President, everything is just peachy. That clown was President for 4 years and it was ok for both Emma and Leo to live here for extended periods of time during those 4 years, but suddenly it is ok to go back now? I wonder about people and their intelligence sometimes.

Anonymous said...

Emma’s Kering position is as a board member not a full time employee, being that senior makes things very flexible, she can work from anywhere and just head in for their quarterly board meetings (which would be remote at present). But even in normal times bar meetings which she can do on zoom she’ll be 99% remote. She can work from where she wants once she complies with visa/tax domicile (she couldn’t stay more than couple of months in LA but can still go for an extended period). I get the feeling that other than stints in NY and LA she just likes home being London. As a wealthy person with property in numerous places she can spend a some time here or there when she wants though. She has the best of both worlds really I wouldn’t feel sorry for her!
On IG previous boyfriends (who had open accounts for work for photographs i.e Brendan wallace or Mack) took a few months to open their accounts, people like Brendan Iribe or Matt Janney never did as they have no reason to. I can’t imagine Leo will.

Anonymous said...

2020 had a lot of riots and stuff though and Emma is meant to be an activist and involved in stuff like these issues I guess she didn't want to have to be involved so now that stuff is ending she would feel its okay to go back to US and not have to be a figurehead for any movements or attend marches or whatever

Anon said...

Mack’s IG was not for work, but he opened his back up after they broke up in 2017. Kind of odd that all while they were dating, his twin brother Tyson kept his public. Maybe because all they post is their nature pictures (which are impressive, I follow both of them) Wallace does use his for work and is public. But yeah, if Leo’s is still private even if/after they’ve broken up, that doesn’t mean he still wants to be affiliated with her. Just some people like to have private IG accounts.

Anon said...

Covid is still pretty bad here, though. It’s be smart if her to NOT move here right now. Even with our new President, covid is still here, ravaging through the streets. And I’ve heard California in particular is a hot spot despite their lockdowns. Idk how well London is doing, but probably better than the US.

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 876   Newer› Newest»